<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160369#M28258</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi George,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you able to share additional information, is parallel hardware available etc?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:12:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160336#M28257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi to all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need some feedback for an upcoming project. We currently have a VSX cluster with 3 VS and a Management server. We need to convert somehow this environment to 3 Physical clusters, one for each VS. We need your expertise for the best way to accomplish this with minimal downtime and a way to revert back fast in case of issues. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160336#M28257</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Georgio1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T10:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160369#M28258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi George,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you able to share additional information, is parallel hardware available etc?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160369#M28258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:12:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160373#M28259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Prepare new clusters in the lab, copy the topoligy and routing from each of the VSs to the relevant physical machines. VS VIPs will correspond to new physical cluster VIPs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will need two more addresses for physical interfaces on each cluster, per network/interface, per cluster.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Consider using private interfaces on the cluster for management purposes only. This will allow you to connect new environment to your production SMS before the network switchover.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Push the same policies, disconnect VSX, connect new clusters to your production network. If you did not make any topology mistakes, this should work right away.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160373#M28259</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160375#M28260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris, yes all the parallel hardware are available.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160375#M28260</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Georgio1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:39:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160376#M28261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Val,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the answer, this is what we had in mind. Do you believe all 3 VS should be replaced at once? what if the customer wants replacement in stages? Currently, we only have two trunks (IN and OUT) for all 3 VS VLANs. Do you think this is possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160376#M28261</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Georgio1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:43:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSX Cluster with 3 VSs to 3 Physical clusters</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160380#M28262</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not at all, you can do gradual migration, per VS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/VSX-Cluster-with-3-VSs-to-3-Physical-clusters/m-p/160380#M28262</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-25T14:52:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

