<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MEP, path fail-over through center in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/159988#M28154</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think we fail back to a specific path unless you're doing active/passive.&lt;BR /&gt;More info here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33086&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33086&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-19T18:34:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MEP, path fail-over through center</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/159746#M28049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Background:&amp;nbsp; I have a hub and spoke VPN community with the center gateways meshed.&amp;nbsp; The community is configured to allow traffic to the center and to other satellites through the center.&amp;nbsp; MEP is enabled and the entry point selection mechanism is set to Select the closet gateway to the source (first to respond) Route injection is enabled.&amp;nbsp; All tests show that satellites start routing traffic through another center should one of the center gateways be no longer available.&amp;nbsp; All good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately it's not real clear how traffic fails back if the original path becomes available again.&amp;nbsp; For example,&amp;nbsp; center gateways are C1, C2, and C3.&amp;nbsp; A satellite is S1&amp;nbsp; Pings times from S1 to C1, C2, C3 are all different as noted below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" width="99.57253585806131%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="39px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;U&gt;Path&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="39px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Site&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="49.94652406417112%" height="39px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ping times&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="39px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="39px"&gt;&lt;P&gt;S1 to C1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="49.94652406417112%" height="39px"&gt;30ms&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="24px"&gt;B&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="24px"&gt;S1 to C2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="49.94652406417112%" height="24px"&gt;100ms&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="24px"&gt;C&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="24.919786096256686%" height="24px"&gt;S1 to C3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="49.94652406417112%" height="24px"&gt;250ms&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario, let's say Path A fails.&amp;nbsp; Traffic fails to Path B.&amp;nbsp; When Path A comes back online my expectation is that traffic will start using this path again because it offers better performance.&amp;nbsp; In my working setup this does not seem to be the case.&amp;nbsp; Is this a setting that has been missed or is this how MEP has been designed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To make matters worse let's say Path A and Path B fail and now Path C is chosen&amp;nbsp; Path A and Path B come back but traffic is still using Path C.&amp;nbsp; User applications are stuck with 8 times worse performance for their applications.&amp;nbsp; Not ideal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the Paths do not auto-fail back to the faster link, is there a way to manually fail the traffic back to the least latent link without bringing the VPN tunnels down?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/159746#M28049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ave_Joe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-17T15:35:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEP, path fail-over through center</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/159988#M28154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think we fail back to a specific path unless you're doing active/passive.&lt;BR /&gt;More info here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33086&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk33086&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/159988#M28154</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-19T18:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEP, path fail-over through center</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/161251#M28532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As an FYI.&amp;nbsp; I opened a TAC case on this inquiry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer is that every time Phase 1 IKE's are renegotiated the MEP decision is re-evaluated and updated accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working on getting this validated in my environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:31:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MEP-path-fail-over-through-center/m-p/161251#M28532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ave_Joe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-04T15:31:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

