<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Sizing for Video Streaming in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33915#M2758</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Dameon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What other information do you requiere to be&amp;nbsp;precise with your answer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jessica_Nowak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-18T14:18:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sizing for Video Streaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33913#M2756</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question regarding adding a new traffic to a existing Checkpoint Infrastructure. My customer have 2 Checkpoint 12600 appliances with one VSX instance in each appliance (HA Architecture). They have an average og 600Mbps passing through the firewall with peaks of 800Mbps. They want to add a 100Mbps video streaming (TV channel) traffic to the exisiting traffic, 24x7 streaming HD video.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I know if the firewalls will support the new traffic?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thinks to take ito account:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) My customer wants to stay with the HA configuracion, no VSLS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) They want to create a new VS instance only for this traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) The traffic will just flow in one direction (Internet to a server protected my Checkpoint) will this be a problem for the Firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Currently the node with the Active VS has this performance: 55% CPU utilization, 50% Memory Utilization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5) Only the firewall blade is active, no IPSm no URL Filtering, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another question that I have is: Why is the 12600 in that high utilization with just 800Mbps traffic when the datasheet says that it can suppot till 14Gbps with just Firewall activited?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S.: I'm attaching the performace report we extracted form the CPView DB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:25:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33913#M2756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jessica_Nowak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-15T09:25:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing for Video Streaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33914#M2757</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might want to rename the attachment attached to your message since it gives away the customer name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, you can merely paste the screenshots directly in the message as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, a&amp;nbsp;lot of things can impact the observed performance on a Security Gateway, including running VSX &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also the version you're running, which was not stated in your original message.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffic flows can play a big role in what your appliance is able to pass.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, a single flow between one source and one destination can be a limiting factor (a so-called elephant flow) on a given flow (not the overall capacity of the box).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, at least with the limited data you provided, I don't see a major issue adding another VS to handle a specific traffic flow (specifically one that is 100mb).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 23:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33914#M2757</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-15T23:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sizing for Video Streaming</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33915#M2758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Dameon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What other information do you requiere to be&amp;nbsp;precise with your answer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Sizing-for-Video-Streaming/m-p/33915#M2758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jessica_Nowak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-18T14:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

