<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CPU Core Usage Imbalance in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141954#M26853</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So i have finally been able to adjust the core settings to use all 4 as FW instances and get them rebooted. I am pleased to report that we are now seeing an even balance of load between all 4 cores.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processors load&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|CPU#|User Time(%)|System Time(%)|Idle Time(%)|Usage(%)|Run queue|Interrupts/sec|&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;| 1| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 2| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 3| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 4| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143746|&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is not our heavy period, so overall usage is lower, but for me, the important thing is that its balanced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that this is a lower-powered solution than the PFSense, we are expecting higher overall CPU usage which we can accept, we just need it to use all 4 cores not just 1-2 as it was before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your assistance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 06:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greatsamps</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-19T06:39:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Core Usage Imbalance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141954#M26853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So i have finally been able to adjust the core settings to use all 4 as FW instances and get them rebooted. I am pleased to report that we are now seeing an even balance of load between all 4 cores.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Processors load&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;|CPU#|User Time(%)|System Time(%)|Idle Time(%)|Usage(%)|Run queue|Interrupts/sec|&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;| 1| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 2| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 3| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143745|&lt;BR /&gt;| 4| 1| 10| 89| 11| ?| 143746|&lt;BR /&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is not our heavy period, so overall usage is lower, but for me, the important thing is that its balanced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that this is a lower-powered solution than the PFSense, we are expecting higher overall CPU usage which we can accept, we just need it to use all 4 cores not just 1-2 as it was before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your assistance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 06:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141954#M26853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greatsamps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-19T06:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Core Usage Imbalance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141968#M26854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Really interesting to see the results with all 4 instances. Never tried such a configuration but with your traffic profile this should be the best solution. But you will have a look nothing changes, you‘ll get in trouble with such configuration if enabling additional blades or traffic changes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 17:21:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141968#M26854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-19T17:21:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Core Usage Imbalance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141976#M26855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes will keep a close eye on it. Is there any sort of best practice in terms of max CPU usage to permit. For example, if say the usage is consistently over say 75% should that be the point to look at upgrading to more cores?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:02:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141976#M26855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greatsamps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-20T07:02:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Core Usage Imbalance</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141985#M26856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not really, as long as you don't have cores hitting 100% utilization frequently it really isn't an issue.&amp;nbsp; An informal tuning goal mentioned in my book is to have an average utilization of roughly 50% across all cores during the firewall's busiest period, but that is just a guideline to know when further tuning efforts are likely past the point of diminishing returns vs. the time spent analyzing and implementing them.&amp;nbsp; As Wolfgang said should you enable any blades that require Medium Path or F2F processing in the future, your performance is very likely to tank with your 4/4 split on 4 cores.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 01:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Re-CPU-Core-Usage-Imbalance/m-p/141985#M26856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-21T01:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

