<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156221#M26740</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is just designated for ease-of-use as Sync and Management - just port speed could be a consideration, but functionality usually is the same for all IFs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:01:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-01T14:01:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156171#M26725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Checkmates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently we use 6700-B as standalone in our production, we need 1 more interface to communicate with DMZ switch but all 8 interfaces already used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In datasheet, i realized that 6700 by default have 10 port :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="6700 port" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17625iB232236C15E64C8A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="6600-appliance-model-label-image.jpg" alt="6700 port" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;6700 port&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and those 2 ports are for sync and management. so my question is, can i use mgmt or sync port for managed the traffic to connecting with DMZ switch? Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156171#M26725</guid>
      <dc:creator>MtxMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T10:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156174#M26726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would use the sync port as you have no cluster and do not need it !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:59:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156174#M26726</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T10:59:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156219#M26738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;so it means possible right&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21294"&gt;@G_W_Albrecht&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156219#M26738</guid>
      <dc:creator>MtxMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T13:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156221#M26740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is just designated for ease-of-use as Sync and Management - just port speed could be a consideration, but functionality usually is the same for all IFs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:01:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156221#M26740</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T14:01:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MGMT Port for Routing and Inspection</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156231#M26743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The interfaces named "Sync" and "Mgmt" only have special names. They are not special in any other way at all. You can use them as additional traffic interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/MGMT-Port-for-Routing-and-Inspection/m-p/156231#M26743</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T14:55:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

