<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Browser Based Auth - Design Question in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Browser-Based-Auth-Design-Question/m-p/152059#M25141</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You'll need HTTPS Inspection for redirects to the Captive Portal to work.&lt;BR /&gt;I don't believe the Captive Portal provides a mechanism to change password nor does IDA necessarily prevent you from logging in from multiple IPs.&lt;BR /&gt;That is the sort of thing the IAM server should be able to enforce, however.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-29T20:12:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Browser Based Auth - Design Question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Browser-Based-Auth-Design-Question/m-p/151465#M24735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Checkmates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently i have customer who need to redesign their networks access flow when user access to the internet. The existing using Sangfor IAM, and i just proposed with Quantum Firewall using Browser Based Auth to intercept access user access to internet with captive portal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Do we need or mandatory enable https inspection to set up browser based auth for https traffic? because i check on SK, some https website can intercept some cant.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How good browser based auth on Check Point? can we set up portal with change password for each user? and create maximum user account only used by for example 2 machine?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Browser-Based-Auth-Design-Question/m-p/151465#M24735</guid>
      <dc:creator>tropicanaslim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-22T12:58:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Browser Based Auth - Design Question</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Browser-Based-Auth-Design-Question/m-p/152059#M25141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You'll need HTTPS Inspection for redirects to the Captive Portal to work.&lt;BR /&gt;I don't believe the Captive Portal provides a mechanism to change password nor does IDA necessarily prevent you from logging in from multiple IPs.&lt;BR /&gt;That is the sort of thing the IAM server should be able to enforce, however.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Browser-Based-Auth-Design-Question/m-p/152059#M25141</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-29T20:12:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

