<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two ISP for default route with failover issues in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150141#M24221</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you see the route change if you check it via the CLI and how is NAT configured on the Gateway?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-03T13:37:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two ISP for default route with failover issues</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150140#M24220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a clusterXL, in cloning group, ith two internet service providers and one ot them gave me a /30 network. To keep my VIP working was necessary create a different subnet that the ISP gave me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Becouse that, isn´t possible to use ISP Redundancy. So, I tried to configure my default route with two gateways with different priorities. ISP 1 with priority 1 and ISP 2 with prioritie 2. All them have a "PING" enabled and "IP Reachability Detection" enabled with external addresses to test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When my ISP with prioirty 1 fails, the backup ISP doens´t take on the internet requests from my network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there some other configuration to do?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150140#M24220</guid>
      <dc:creator>tiagosilva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T13:33:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two ISP for default route with failover issues</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150141#M24221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you see the route change if you check it via the CLI and how is NAT configured on the Gateway?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150141#M24221</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T13:37:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two ISP for default route with failover issues</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150142#M24222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I configured this for customer last year and definitely works fine. I assume you are using primary/backup? Can you do some captures and traces to see why its failing when connections go to your secondary link?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 13:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150142#M24222</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T13:40:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two ISP for default route with failover issues</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150146#M24224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When the ISP with priority 1 fails, the default route disappear. The NAT is enabled on the gateway, "Hide internal networks behind..."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150146#M24224</guid>
      <dc:creator>tiagosilva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T14:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two ISP for default route with failover issues</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150148#M24225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Captura de tela 2022-06-03 111444.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/16812i19989EC98C6B5637/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Captura de tela 2022-06-03 111444.png" alt="Captura de tela 2022-06-03 111444.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 14:18:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Two-ISP-for-default-route-with-failover-issues/m-p/150148#M24225</guid>
      <dc:creator>tiagosilva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-03T14:18:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

