<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about sk102662 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/150036#M24154</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We did that last night, same thing, but will try again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-02T13:35:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149981#M24100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a question about sk102662. So we followed the commands with TAC help on the phone, but when we do show route ospf via clish, nothing comes up. We even did routed debugs and it was complaining about tag number, we gave it tag 1, but same issue. We simply wanted to test one subnet to distribute from static to ospf.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any idea if maybe another command is missing?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fwpm1&amp;gt; show routemap static-to-ospf id 10&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Routemap : "static-to-ospf" Id : 10 [permit]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Match Conditions:&lt;BR /&gt;IPv4 Prefixes :&lt;BR /&gt;1.2.3.0/24 Exact&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Protocol : static&lt;BR /&gt;Tag : 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tx a lot for the help as always!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 02:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149981#M24100</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T02:48:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149982#M24101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tags seem to be supported only for OSPF to BGP exports:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Configures the Route Map to match OSPF external routes with the specified &lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;tag&lt;/SPAN&gt; value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Multiple &lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;tag&lt;/SPAN&gt; match conditions can be added to a given Route Map ID to broaden the range of &lt;SPAN class="SearchHighlight SearchHighlight1"&gt;tag&lt;/SPAN&gt; values which are matched.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Currently this feature can only be used to export OSPF routes to BGP.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 04:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149982#M24101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T04:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149995#M24132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We tried without a tag and its exact same issue...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 09:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/149995#M24132</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T09:01:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/150035#M24153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;swap export and import to see if that works.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/150035#M24153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T13:31:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/150036#M24154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We did that last night, same thing, but will try again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/150036#M24154</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-02T13:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about sk102662</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/151848#M25009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to update on this, if anyone ever has same problem in the future...CP config was fine, customer simply did not properly re-distribute right routes on Cisco end, that was it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Question-about-sk102662/m-p/151848#M25009</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-27T14:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

