<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Additional Cluster in same VLAN R80.40 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Additional-Cluster-in-same-VLAN-R80-40/m-p/149267#M23909</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we plan to add a second Check Point Cluster to VLANs where already a Check Point cluster is establised.&lt;BR /&gt;Both Clusters have R80.40.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According &lt;A title="sk25977" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk25977&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL," target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk25977&lt;/A&gt; this can be an issue with &amp;lt;R80.30 and some tweaks are necessary.&lt;BR /&gt;It's stated that this SK is not relevant to Gateways R80.40 and higher but no info is given what changes where made or if we have to do something else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to make sure nothing unexpected will happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thx&lt;BR /&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 14:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>D_W</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-23T14:23:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Additional Cluster in same VLAN R80.40</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Additional-Cluster-in-same-VLAN-R80-40/m-p/149267#M23909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we plan to add a second Check Point Cluster to VLANs where already a Check Point cluster is establised.&lt;BR /&gt;Both Clusters have R80.40.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According &lt;A title="sk25977" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk25977&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=ClusterXL," target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk25977&lt;/A&gt; this can be an issue with &amp;lt;R80.30 and some tweaks are necessary.&lt;BR /&gt;It's stated that this SK is not relevant to Gateways R80.40 and higher but no info is given what changes where made or if we have to do something else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to make sure nothing unexpected will happen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thx&lt;BR /&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 14:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Additional-Cluster-in-same-VLAN-R80-40/m-p/149267#M23909</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-23T14:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Additional Cluster in same VLAN R80.40</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Additional-Cluster-in-same-VLAN-R80-40/m-p/149270#M23911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17503"&gt;@D_W&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;it's done automatically. If other then their own CCP packets are seen by the new cluster another&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;Cluster_Global_ID&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;(different from the existing cluster) will be used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 14:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Additional-Cluster-in-same-VLAN-R80-40/m-p/149270#M23911</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-23T14:55:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

