https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-Redundancy-with-manual-NAT-for-Internet/m-p/148655#M23754 <P>Depending on the version, you may experience this issue, look into&nbsp;<SPAN>sk151112. Otherwise, Hide NAT behind the GW should work.</SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Mon, 16 May 2022 06:35:44 GMT _Val_ 2022-05-16T06:35:44Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-Redundancy-with-manual-NAT-for-Internet/m-p/148654#M23753 <P>Hi guys,</P><P>I have a question about ISP Redundancy and manual NAT for outgoing to internet. I have a customer with two ISP´s. Before they contract a new ISP, they not use a "Hide internal networks..." on cluster object.&nbsp;</P><P>I try to use a manual NAT for the new ISP, but if the primary link fails, the active link doens´t route my internal requests to internet. The one way that I found to using the two ISP was using the option NAT - "Hide internal networks behind..."in the cluster object.</P><P>Are there some way to use manual NAT outgoing to internet with two ISP in my gateway?</P> Sun, 15 May 2022 23:57:10 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-Redundancy-with-manual-NAT-for-Internet/m-p/148654#M23753 tiagosilva 2022-05-15T23:57:10Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-Redundancy-with-manual-NAT-for-Internet/m-p/148655#M23754 <P>Depending on the version, you may experience this issue, look into&nbsp;<SPAN>sk151112. Otherwise, Hide NAT behind the GW should work.</SPAN></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Mon, 16 May 2022 06:35:44 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-Redundancy-with-manual-NAT-for-Internet/m-p/148655#M23754 _Val_ 2022-05-16T06:35:44Z