<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145429#M22913</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; CompA and MyOrg are not connected via Site to Site VPN....just a secured fiber link between us.&amp;nbsp; I should have clarified better in the initial posting.&amp;nbsp; Unsure if the Star community as you described will still work in that case?&amp;nbsp; Could I still include the CompA subnets in my local encryption domain even though I don't provide those subnets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may be overthinking this design, but it's throwing me for a loop.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 19:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>00071491</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-04T19:23:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145406#M22906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running R80.40 and have a question regarding IP routing through a site-to-site VPN.&amp;nbsp; My Org has a private fiber connection to Company A, with one hop in between.&amp;nbsp; Company B and my org are standing up a new site-to-site VPN.&amp;nbsp; Company B needs access to data in Company A, using My Org as a connecting point.&amp;nbsp; CompA will not allow CompB to directly connect to them via VPN and CompA requires CompB to jump through My Org first.&amp;nbsp; This is atypical for us and unfamiliar with how this may work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&amp;nbsp; How can the VPN between My Org and CompB be set up to allow CompB access to the subnets at CompA?&amp;nbsp; My confusion is on my side of the VPN Domain and routing pass through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rory&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 15:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145406#M22906</guid>
      <dc:creator>00071491</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-04T15:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145427#M22912</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On your side you can do a Star community, with yourself as center and CompA and B as satellites.&amp;nbsp; Make sure to select the option route through center and to create the policies to allow traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assuming CompB is a Check Point not managed by your SMS, on that SMS you will have the encryption domain for the My Org firewall to include CompA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 18:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145427#M22912</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruan_Kotze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-04T18:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145429#M22913</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; CompA and MyOrg are not connected via Site to Site VPN....just a secured fiber link between us.&amp;nbsp; I should have clarified better in the initial posting.&amp;nbsp; Unsure if the Star community as you described will still work in that case?&amp;nbsp; Could I still include the CompA subnets in my local encryption domain even though I don't provide those subnets?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may be overthinking this design, but it's throwing me for a loop.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 19:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145429#M22913</guid>
      <dc:creator>00071491</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-04T19:23:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145431#M22915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not necessary to change the community to Star, but I'm sure you will need to have CompA subnets in your encryption domain.&amp;nbsp; If not, your gateway will drop encrypted packets destined to CompA coming through the CompB tunnel (you'll get a log entry saying encrypted packet should be clear text).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You will need to double-check that your firewall routing is correct, also the CompA network will need to route return traffic via your gateway. Anti-Spoofing on the internal CP interface might also drop return traffic, so keep an eye on that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145431#M22915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruan_Kotze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-04T20:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design and Concept: Acting as a Proxy Organization in VPN Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145502#M22934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll give that a try, thank you for the suggestions.&amp;nbsp; I report back our findings once we've had a chance to work with the other parties involved.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 13:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Design-and-Concept-Acting-as-a-Proxy-Organization-in-VPN-Tunnel/m-p/145502#M22934</guid>
      <dc:creator>00071491</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T13:28:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

