<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WAN link Redundancy in VSX in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144101#M22406</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, there isn't really a way to achieve this under R77.30.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Your best bet is to upgrade to a supported version where other options exist.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-17T18:46:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WAN link Redundancy in VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144055#M22397</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A customer has a R77.30 VSX environment with one of its virtual system connected to a VPN via WAN link to a remote site.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The customer would like to have a Redundant WAN link connected. However&amp;nbsp; with VSX limitations ISP Redundancy and VTI are not supported. Do you know of any other VSX solution &amp;nbsp;of connecting a 2nd WAN link to the environment?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Note: The customer's environment&amp;nbsp;will be upgraded to a higher version soon, however the VSX limitations remain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144055#M22397</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trinickrs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T14:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN link Redundancy in VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144066#M22398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Once you upgrade to a newer release, you should have options with PBR and/or route monitoring.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:40:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144066#M22398</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T14:40:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN link Redundancy in VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144074#M22400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback PhoneBoy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I'm was looking for an immediate solution to have the redundant WAN link in the environment.&amp;nbsp; Since the customer can't give any maintenance window at this time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144074#M22400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trinickrs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T14:59:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN link Redundancy in VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144078#M22401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;What is the current physical topology and have you explored solutions external to the cluster itself?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;R77.30 is long out of support and a risk, some would argue this is worse than the proposed controlled downtime.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;VTI is supported with VSX on R81 and above.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144078#M22401</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T15:39:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN link Redundancy in VSX</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144101#M22406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, there isn't really a way to achieve this under R77.30.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Your best bet is to upgrade to a supported version where other options exist.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/WAN-link-Redundancy-in-VSX/m-p/144101#M22406</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-17T18:46:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

