<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0% in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143036#M22174</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is expected on the standby member.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Review the stats on the active member instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-05T15:10:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143029#M22169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am facing an issue with secure XL. Traffics not accelerated by Secure XL. F2Fed is 99%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest. Screenshot attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version: R81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Blade: IPS and FW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rule:350&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAM: 8 GB (85% used)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143029#M22169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul_Borah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T13:07:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143030#M22170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the WAN connection PPPoE?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or are you using any of the following IPS protections:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "SYN Attack" ("SYNDefender") is activated in SmartDefense / IPS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Small PMTU" is activated in SmartDefense / IPS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Network Quota" is activated in SmartDefense / IPS (refer to sk31630).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Malicious IPs" (DShield.org Storm Center) is activated in SmartDefense / IPS (because it uses Dynamic Objects).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please also share the following output to start:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[Expert@MyGW:0]# fwaccel stat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 13:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143030#M22170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T13:40:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143033#M22171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the details...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* Is the WAN connection PPPoE? NO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "SYN Attack" ("SYNDefender") is activated in SmartDefense / IPS. Enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Small PMTU" is activated in SmartDefense / IPS. Inactive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Network Quota" is activated in SmartDefense / IPS (refer to sk31630). Inactive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* When IPS protection "Malicious IPs" (DShield.org Storm Center) is activated in SmartDefense / IPS (because it uses Dynamic Objects). Inactive&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Screenshot attached...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143033#M22171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul_Borah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T14:43:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143034#M22172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only red flag is SYNDefender being enabled, but that functionality was added into SecureXL in R80.20 and should not be the cause of high F2F.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk120476&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPS," target="_blank"&gt;sk120476: Important changes in IPS "SYN Attack" (SYN Defender) protection&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Was the &lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel stats -s&lt;/STRONG&gt; command run on the standby member of a cluster?&amp;nbsp; If so high F2F is expected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please provide the output of &lt;STRONG&gt;enabled_blades&lt;/STRONG&gt; and the Super Seven commands for further diagnosis:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Scripts/S7PAC-Super-Seven-Performance-Assessment-Commands/m-p/40528" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Scripts/S7PAC-Super-Seven-Performance-Assessment-Commands/m-p/40528&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:51:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143034#M22172</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T14:51:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143035#M22173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please find the details...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was the fwaccel stats -s command run on the standby member of a cluster? If so high F2F is expected.&lt;BR /&gt;A- Yes, F2F is 99%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide the output of enabled_blades and the Super Seven commands for further diagnosis:&lt;BR /&gt;A- Only FW and IPS blads are enable&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143035#M22173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul_Borah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T15:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic not accelerated by Secure XL-0%</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143036#M22174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is expected on the standby member.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Review the stats on the active member instead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:10:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Traffic-not-accelerated-by-Secure-XL-0/m-p/143036#M22174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-05T15:10:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

