<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: January 19, 2038 : next Millennium bug ? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27463#M2156</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you've alright : MANY things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just wanted to initiate the conversation ; since this message I understood that 64bits counters fix the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:53:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>XavierBens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-11T13:53:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>January 19, 2038 : next Millennium bug ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27461#M2154</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, a recent product alert (sk122612‌) highlights a problematic which will impact all unix systems in twenty years : we will have reached 2^31 seconds since epoch (January 1, 1970 midnight).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Off course Check Point products and pre-R77.30 Jumbo HF Take_143 are concerned as gaia is UNIX based.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to this, Check Point is setting the certificate expiration date to be equal to the maximum Unix epoch time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know if there is a &lt;SPAN class="" lang="en"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;global reflection of the community&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; regarding this limitation ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27461#M2154</guid>
      <dc:creator>XavierBens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-05T19:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: January 19, 2038 : next Millennium bug ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27462#M2155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure I understand the exact question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, I expect this Unix epoch issue will impact MANY things, far more than the Y2K bug did.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 00:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27462#M2155</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-11T00:33:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: January 19, 2038 : next Millennium bug ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27463#M2156</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you've alright : MANY things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just wanted to initiate the conversation ; since this message I understood that 64bits counters fix the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:53:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/27463#M2156</guid>
      <dc:creator>XavierBens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-11T13:53:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: January 19, 2038 : next Millennium bug ?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/269237#M53284</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV id="bodyDisplay_2aa5a25dcb133_7" class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looks like R82.10 switches to 64-bit time_t, which is the biggest step towards addressing the 2038 issue:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample  language-markup"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;[Expert@SomeFirewall]# cpinfo -y fw1

This is Check Point CPinfo Build 914000224 for GAIA
[FW1]
	HOTFIX_INEXT_NANO_EGG_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_UCA_SSH_TUNNELING_SERVICE_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_UCA_SSH_TUNNELING_APP_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_UCA_INFRA_MONITOR_SERVICE_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_UCA_INFRA_LOG_SERVICE_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_UCA_INFRA_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE
	HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE

FW1 build number:
This is Check Point's software version R82.10 - Build 767
kernel: R82.10 - Build 768

[Expert@SomeFirewall]# date +%s -d"Jan 19, 2038 03:14:07Z"
2147483647

[Expert@SomeFirewall]# date +%s -d"Jan 19, 2038 03:14:08Z"
2147483648

[Expert@SomeFirewall]# date +%s -d"Jan 19, 20380 03:14:08Z"
580965016448&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/January-19-2038-next-Millennium-bug/m-p/269237#M53284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-30T15:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

