<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Achieving BGP ECMP with Check Point R80.30 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138427#M20998</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;HI Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 BGP Links terminated on 6900 firewall and I wanted to achieve BGP ECMP with link 1 and 3. I guess due to Path and certain BGP change its picking up best route. Can someone please help me editing BGP attributes so that I can achive BGP ECMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt; show bgp paths

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): IGP.(Id-1)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 1      Ases: 0      Segments: 0      Overhead: 96

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): IGP.(Id-2)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 17      Ases: 0      Segments: 0      Overhead: 96

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): 1,IGP.(Id-23)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 1      Ases: 0      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65001,64520,IGP.(Id-61)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.153      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65001
    Refs: 2      Ases: 2      Segments: 1      Overhead: 106

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65001,IGP.(Id-62)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.153      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65001
    Refs: 2      Ases: 1      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65520,4755,65520,IGP.(Id-63)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.129      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65520
    Refs: 2      Ases: 3      Segments: 1      Overhead: 110

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,Incomplete.(Id-64)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 10      Ases: 1      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,9730,IGP.(Id-65)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 2      Ases: 2      Segments: 1      Overhead: 106

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,9730,9730,9730,9730,IGP.(Id-66)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 4      Ases: 5      Segments: 1      Overhead: 118&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need BGP ECMP between&amp;nbsp;172.43.149.41 and&amp;nbsp;192.168.203.153&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Blason_R</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-14T07:46:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Achieving BGP ECMP with Check Point R80.30</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138427#M20998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 3 BGP Links terminated on 6900 firewall and I wanted to achieve BGP ECMP with link 1 and 3. I guess due to Path and certain BGP change its picking up best route. Can someone please help me editing BGP attributes so that I can achive BGP ECMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt; show bgp paths

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): IGP.(Id-1)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 1      Ases: 0      Segments: 0      Overhead: 96

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): IGP.(Id-2)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 17      Ases: 0      Segments: 0      Overhead: 96

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): 1,IGP.(Id-23)
    Nexthop: 0.0.0.0      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 0
    Refs: 1      Ases: 0      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65001,64520,IGP.(Id-61)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.153      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65001
    Refs: 2      Ases: 2      Segments: 1      Overhead: 106

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65001,IGP.(Id-62)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.153      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65001
    Refs: 2      Ases: 1      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),65520,4755,65520,IGP.(Id-63)
    Nexthop: 192.168.203.129      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 65520
    Refs: 2      Ases: 3      Segments: 1      Overhead: 110

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,Incomplete.(Id-64)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 10      Ases: 1      Segments: 1      Overhead: 102

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,9730,IGP.(Id-65)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 2      Ases: 2      Segments: 1      Overhead: 106

AS Path (AS Plain Notation): (64520),9730,9730,9730,9730,9730,IGP.(Id-66)
    Nexthop: 172.43.149.41      LocalAS: 64520      NeighborAS: 9730
    Refs: 4      Ases: 5      Segments: 1      Overhead: 118&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Need BGP ECMP between&amp;nbsp;172.43.149.41 and&amp;nbsp;192.168.203.153&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138427#M20998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Blason_R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-14T07:46:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Achieving BGP ECMP with Check Point R80.30</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138432#M21003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would suggest to contact CP TAC for this...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138432#M21003</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-14T08:31:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Achieving BGP ECMP with Check Point R80.30</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138520#M21032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have a diagram to accompany the above?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The following SKs will help with the fundamentals of ECMP &amp;amp; AS_PATH prepending which are likely required here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk100504 (ECMP)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sk103047 (AS_PATH)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That said it's probably more something for Pro Services than TAC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 16:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Achieving-BGP-ECMP-with-Check-Point-R80-30/m-p/138520#M21032</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-15T16:13:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

