<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136271#M20587</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The latest GA take for R80.40 is Take 139, not take 125.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nik_Bloemers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-14T12:21:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136225#M20584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a kind reminder for our lovely vendor, that R81 is still leaking memory here and there and a JHF is desperately needed to fix those.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136225#M20584</guid>
      <dc:creator>HristoGrigorov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T06:02:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136235#M20585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think it's a bit strange that R81 is the widely recommended version above R80.40 now, but R80.40 is further along with jumbo fixes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 06:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136235#M20585</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nik_Bloemers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T06:41:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136259#M20586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No - this is a misunderstanding, see &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://supportcontent.checkpoint.com/solutions?id=sk164258" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Jumbo Hotfix Takes Compatibility&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;80.40 JHF Take 125&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; is aligned to R81 JHF Take 42 except the fix for PRJ-27977&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136259#M20586</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T10:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136271#M20587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The latest GA take for R80.40 is Take 139, not take 125.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136271#M20587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nik_Bloemers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T12:21:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136287#M20588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;True - Take 125 ist the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;GA from 04 October 2021.&lt;/STRONG&gt; And R81 GA is Take 44 - i just would not say that R80.40 is much further than R81&amp;nbsp;8)&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:15:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136287#M20588</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T14:15:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kind reminder for new R81 JHF</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136288#M20589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you compare the list of fixes, there's quite a difference &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; Everything that was in R80.40 ongoing take 126 (quite a list) from October 13th and higher is still in the 'Upcoming fixes' list for R81 jumbo. I'm waiting for a new R81 jumbo (even ongoing is fine) to have fix parity - I have some relevant fixes applicable from R80.40 T126 - so I can finally upgrade our gateways. So R81 is 2 months behind basically.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Kind-reminder-for-new-R81-JHF/m-p/136288#M20589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nik_Bloemers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-14T14:19:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

