<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hotfix install on cluster with load sharing in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26198#M2049</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would definitely do both at the same time. As in not leaving 2 days in-between. Then uninstall hotfix or restore snapshot as you suggested yourself. Which is your current version and which hotfix are you installing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-22T19:08:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hotfix install on cluster with load sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26197#M2048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I pretend do install an hotfix R80.10 on a cluster environment with 2 GW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When it is a ClusterXL HA, you install in the backup node, CU failover to backup node, and let it work 1 or 2 days. If there is no issue, the hotfix is installed on the main node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With this approach there are 1 or 2 days the versions mismatch on the Cluster, so in this period failovers are avoided and if a failover happens, there could be some service degradation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the cluster is in load-sharing mode, I suppose the 1-2 days of different versions is something to be avoided at all cost, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, how can we proceed?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update both at the same time? In case of issues, the hotfix must be uninstalled or use a previous snapshot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one will be updated first? The pivot or the other?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The load share can be changed from 30/70 to 0/100 or 100/0, but this changes the database, which is something that I like to avoid.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or should we convert to ClusterXL HA, do the "normal" update, and the convert again to load-sharing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which is the best procedure for hotfix update/install on load-sharing clusters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26197#M2048</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rui_Pereira1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-22T10:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hotfix install on cluster with load sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26198#M2049</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would definitely do both at the same time. As in not leaving 2 days in-between. Then uninstall hotfix or restore snapshot as you suggested yourself. Which is your current version and which hotfix are you installing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 19:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26198#M2049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-22T19:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hotfix install on cluster with load sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26199#M2050</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; color: black;"&gt;Being a cluster LB with 2 GW, leaving 2 days between will lead to 30% of load with an older HF, and 70% of the load with the new HF, which in case of issues can be difficult to troubleshoot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: transparent; color: #3d3d3d; font-family: Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; color: black;"&gt;Current version: R80.10 Take 421 with HF 56.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: transparent; color: #3d3d3d; font-family: Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; color: black;"&gt;To install: HF 169.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26199#M2050</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rui_Pereira1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-23T14:20:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hotfix install on cluster with load sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26200#M2051</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly. That's why doing both is much better idea   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Hotfix-install-on-cluster-with-load-sharing/m-p/26200#M2051</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-23T19:48:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

