<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132134#M19550</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In my experience, standard Cisco cables always worked.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-19T16:52:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maestro cabling to Serial Terminal Console Servers</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132133#M19549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to connect several Check Point appliances with a 19" serial terminal console server.&lt;BR /&gt;I already found cabling documentation for Maestro MHO-140 appliances:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;@&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Maestro_GettingStartedGuide/Topics-Maestro-GSG/RJ45-to-DB9-Pinout.htm?tocpath=Additional%20Information%7C_____4" target="_self"&gt;Check Point&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;@&lt;A href="https://docs.mellanox.com/display/sn2000pub/Interface+Specifications" target="_self"&gt;Mellanox&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and for old Nokia IP390 appliances&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;@&lt;A href="http://downloads.checkpoint.com/dc/download.htm?ID=9863" target="_self"&gt;Check Point&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk40149" target="_self"&gt;sk40149&lt;/A&gt; mentions that a Cisco RJ45 rollover cable might work as well&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I didn't find these for 15600 / 16600 appliances. Are these identical?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 14:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132133#M19549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T14:12:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132134#M19550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my experience, standard Cisco cables always worked.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:52:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132134#M19550</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T16:52:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132135#M19551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I second what&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/181"&gt;@_Val_&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;said...my experience was such as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:58:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132135#M19551</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T16:58:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132137#M19552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. You mean these:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 160px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14024iBD8D20E565C45DDE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ok, will try. In my experience it depends on the Pin-out settings of the serial terminal console server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm using a 19"&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.perle.com/products/iolan-sts-terminal-server.shtml" target="_self"&gt;Perle STS8&lt;/A&gt;. (&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.perle.com/support_services/documentation_pdfs/iolan_rack_qsg.pdf" target="_self"&gt;Pin-out overview&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 17:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132137#M19552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T17:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132163#M19555</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The sky-blue Cisco console cables were what I called a "rollover" cable, and matches the pinout diagram you provided.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132163#M19555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-20T00:20:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132427#M19614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On our digiport servers in our lab environment I have RJ45 pin-out, using normal lan kabels I go over distance, than have a RJ45 to DB9 connector which then connects using the cables delivered with the appliances (or blue cisco cables).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:11:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132427#M19614</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-22T12:11:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RJ45 Pin assignments still the same as Nokia?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132431#M19616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I ordered&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.perle.com/products/product_detail.asp?a=4&amp;amp;i=04030080&amp;amp;c=74" target="_self"&gt;Cisco crossover adapters&lt;/A&gt; and attached them to standard patch cables.&lt;BR /&gt;This worked well with my&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.perle.com/products/iolan-sts-terminal-server.shtml" target="_self" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Perle IOLAN STS Terminal Console Server&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:28:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Maestro-cabling-to-Serial-Terminal-Console-Servers/m-p/132431#M19616</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-17T16:28:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

