<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132099#M19537</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The NAT Rule base let you easily define such configuration - look into Dashboard...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-19T11:35:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132073#M19527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hey,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a problem with overlapping networks in S2S connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we currently have the configuration currently on our cisco that it performs destination nat based on "network to network" for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;192.168.1.x -&amp;gt; 10.10.1.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that way we do not need to configure 100 NAT rules, and the cisco router know to perform NAT for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;192.168.1.1 to 10.10.1.1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;192.168.1.1 to 10.10.1.1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have multi[le subnets like this,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:18:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132073#M19527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dor_Marcovitch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T10:18:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132080#M19530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And what is the issue here ? You only mention a Cisco device (and not even which one)...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132080#M19530</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T10:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132083#M19531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we need to remove this cisco device and move the S2S to be between the 3rd party to our checkpoint GW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it some cisco router i dont know the model&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132083#M19531</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dor_Marcovitch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T10:45:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132086#M19534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;But what is the problem you are facing ? You can define these NAT rules on CP easily ! I suggest to read&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;partition=Advanced&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;sk108600: VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132086#M19534</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T11:01:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132095#M19535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the problem is not with phase2, i wonder i f this NAT configuration is supported or not&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132095#M19535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dor_Marcovitch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T11:22:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132097#M19536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe what you are looking for is NAT Pools&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:25:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132097#M19536</guid>
      <dc:creator>HristoGrigorov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T11:25:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subnet to Subnet NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132099#M19537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The NAT Rule base let you easily define such configuration - look into Dashboard...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Subnet-to-Subnet-NAT/m-p/132099#M19537</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-19T11:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

