<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/128841#M18795</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;MAB is effectively a reverse proxy and it's designed with security in mind.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure that you will see much security benefit from putting MAB behind a WAF.&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, the WAF will most likely require some level of tuning in order to permit the necessary traffic for SNX.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-07T08:07:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/128826#M18792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out if Check Point SSL VPN/MAB portal can be routed through WAF or reverse proxy? I tried with nginx however I am able to login but it fails at the SNX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone tried this before? Is it really needed to put the MAB portal behind WAF? Are we gonna get any benefit out of it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Blason R&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 03:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/128826#M18792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Blason_R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-07T03:32:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/128841#M18795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MAB is effectively a reverse proxy and it's designed with security in mind.&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure that you will see much security benefit from putting MAB behind a WAF.&lt;BR /&gt;In any case, the WAF will most likely require some level of tuning in order to permit the necessary traffic for SNX.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/128841#M18795</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-07T08:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129689#M19003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well - I decided to debug and as I said I can loing successfully but when snx pops up it does not go after that. Can someone help me here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the logs it does not go after and I receive error at SNX popup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;45.112.144.190 - - [19/Sep/2021:10:41:10 +0530] "GET /Login/ComponentFrame?nPageMode=2&amp;amp;snxVersion=80,0,0064,18 HTTP/1.1" 200 1150 "&lt;A href="https://xx.xx.xx.xx/SNX/extender" target="_blank"&gt;https://xx.xx.xx.xx/SNX/extender&lt;/A&gt;" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 05:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129689#M19003</guid>
      <dc:creator>Blason_R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-19T05:13:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129728#M19006</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What precisely is this a log from?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129728#M19006</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T02:07:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129730#M19007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you referring to those logs? Those are nginx reverse proxy logs and when I debug further I observed that Mobile Access Portal is sending or hopping to Websocket once the connection is established which is sending a Header to Upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure whether that would help?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess little more persistence from me and assistance from you guys would definitely help me to achieve the solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129730#M19007</guid>
      <dc:creator>Blason_R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T02:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone tried adding MAB portal behind WAF or reverse Proxy?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129732#M19008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Certainly the more information you can provide the better.&lt;BR /&gt;That said, SNX surely expects to talk to the MAB gateway directly and isn't meant to be proxied through something else.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Has-anyone-tried-adding-MAB-portal-behind-WAF-or-reverse-Proxy/m-p/129732#M19008</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-20T02:53:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

