<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interface mismatch and failover in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/123700#M17799</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 2 pair of checkpoint of in HA mode. I have 1 question, if i add one virtual interface on standby box n push policy will it failover and become active box ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 08:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kaus2005007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-13T08:15:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interface mismatch and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/123700#M17799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 2 pair of checkpoint of in HA mode. I have 1 question, if i add one virtual interface on standby box n push policy will it failover and become active box ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 08:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/123700#M17799</guid>
      <dc:creator>kaus2005007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-13T08:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface mismatch and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/123714#M17803</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you want it to fail over, because there are better ways of accomplishing this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In terms of adding an interface without failover this would be the high-level way of doing it:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Stop the clustering on Standby member&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Perform all operations on Standby member&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Perform all operations on Active member&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Perform all operations in SmartConsole&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Start the clustering on Standby member&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Detailed guidance can be found in&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk57100.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/123714#M17803</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ruan_Kotze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-13T11:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface mismatch and failover</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/124083#M17850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Ruan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to know will there be automatic failover as there will be config mismatch between. will standby firewall become active (as most recent updated config on standby fw).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Interface-mismatch-and-failover/m-p/124083#M17850</guid>
      <dc:creator>kaus2005007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T13:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

