<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release) in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121623#M17354</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;not sure about this, but could you not just run x2 GRE tunnels through the Checkpoints?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 10:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-20T10:12:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121544#M17315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Mates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does someone know if the R81.10 will support redundant IPSec VPN and VxLAN over IPSec?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know, the R80.40 and R81 do not support multiple link selection for the multiple VPN tunnels (different public subnets).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I want to achieve:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="VxLAN_IPSec.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/12221i33A5AA68AE6BAF3A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="VxLAN_IPSec.jpg" alt="VxLAN_IPSec.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121544#M17315</guid>
      <dc:creator>hdas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T11:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121552#M17317</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could try VPN Link Selection in Load Sharing mode. According to the FAQ here (&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk56384&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec#Topology" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk56384&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec#Topology&lt;/A&gt;) it will only create one VPN Tunnel and balance the packets between the different links.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:10:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121552#M17317</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benedikt_Weissl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T14:10:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121577#M17327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pretty sure this is not among the features supported, see:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Product-Announcements/R81-10-EA-Program-Production/ba-p/110053" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Product-Announcements/R81-10-EA-Program-Production/ba-p/110053&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mostly likely this exact configuration is an RFE and I encourage you to bring it through your local Check Point office.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 20:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121577#M17327</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T20:08:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121623#M17354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;not sure about this, but could you not just run x2 GRE tunnels through the Checkpoints?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 10:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121623#M17354</guid>
      <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-20T10:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121694#M17370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My goal was to find a way to use both internet connections at the same time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121694#M17370</guid>
      <dc:creator>hdas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-21T09:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121695#M17371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi PhoneBoy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if the local office will be able to support me on this. We need to look elsewhere, disaggregation maybe? Just think how useful would be to have the control plane (VRF, virtual router..etc) in ClusterXL?&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_heart_eyes:"&gt;😍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121695#M17371</guid>
      <dc:creator>hdas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-21T09:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL - VxLAN over redundant IPSec VPN (R81.10 and future release)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121699#M17373</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can use ISP Redundancy for LAN to WAN Traffic und VPN Load Sharing (&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_SitetoSiteVPN_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm?topic=documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_SitetoSiteVPN_AdminGuide/136968" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_SitetoSiteVPN_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm?topic=documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_SitetoSiteVPN_AdminGuide/136968&lt;/A&gt;) for Site2Site VPN Traffic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-VxLAN-over-redundant-IPSec-VPN-R81-10-and-future/m-p/121699#M17373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Benedikt_Weissl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-21T11:04:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

