<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Full Encyption Domain Overlap in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118423#M16774</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Your choices are NAT or renumber one side or the other.&lt;BR /&gt;And you'd probably create a separate VPN community between Site1/3 and the Fortinet Cluster.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 21:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-14T21:55:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Full Encyption Domain Overlap</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118227#M16746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are about to setup a new tunnel with another office which has a subnet that is in our encryption domain.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The new office has a Fortinet cluster but they also have an 192.168.0.0/22 subnet.&amp;nbsp; The diagram shows our current Checkpoint star community&amp;nbsp; and we need to connect two sites to this cluster.&amp;nbsp; I am interested in how would people suggest we best deal with this?&amp;nbsp; I am guessing if we cannot change the subnet at one end then we will need to NAT the entire subnet at the Fortinet.&amp;nbsp; I currently have the 3 checkpoint clusters setup as centre GW's in the start community so I assume it would be better to add the Fortinet as a satellite to the same community rather than create two new ones (connecting site 2 would not be a problem).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.JPG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/11669i5CED1DFD2AF406EB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Capture.JPG" alt="Capture.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 11:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118227#M16746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon_Dyke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-12T11:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full Encyption Domain Overlap</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118423#M16774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your choices are NAT or renumber one side or the other.&lt;BR /&gt;And you'd probably create a separate VPN community between Site1/3 and the Fortinet Cluster.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 21:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118423#M16774</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-14T21:55:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full Encyption Domain Overlap</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118431#M16776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I cant recall now, but there is an sk that explains how to do this with user.def file on mgmt server if you have overlapping domains.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;srcFavorites=favorites#Scenario%201" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk108600&amp;amp;srcFavorites=favorites#Scenario%201&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, I know there are some new guidbedit vpn features in R80, but I dont believe they are related to overlapping enc domains. Let me check if I can find anything for you, because I had similar scenario with customer recently.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 22:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118431#M16776</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-14T22:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Full Encyption Domain Overlap</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118432#M16777</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Also, below might help as well...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk106837&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk106837&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=IPSec&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 22:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Full-Encyption-Domain-Overlap/m-p/118432#M16777</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-14T22:28:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

