<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21617#M1664</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep, that will definitely do it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-04T14:25:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21610#M1657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case someone else was using SK&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk100223" title="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk100223"&gt;How to enable stripping of X-Forward-For (XFF) field&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that it worked perfectly OK in R70.30 and we never bothered checking it after upgrades to R80.10, just assumed it worked. Today just by pure chance I stumbled across the fact that our internal IPs are being sent out in XFF header that were supposed to be stripped out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing that I noticed with R80.10 is that kernel parameter&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;ws_remove_proxy_connection_header&lt;/STRONG&gt; doesn't seem to work anymore&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/69752_pastedImage_4.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone else&amp;nbsp;could verify this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SR submitted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21610#M1657</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T09:43:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21611#M1658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the SK says it's relevant for R80.10, it's probably worth a TAC case to investigate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21611#M1658</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T11:16:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21612#M1659</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sk speaks about two procedures (depending on the IA blade) to enable this, one in Dashboard and one in GUIdbEdit. Then we find the comment: It has been observed that XFF stripping may still not function, even if all the above steps are performed correctly, when the value of kernel parameter '&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;ws_remove_proxy_connection_header&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;' is set to 0 (zero).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It say : May !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:22:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21612#M1659</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T12:22:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21613#M1660</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's why I added the screenshot - it does not recognise the parameter &lt;img id="smileysad" class="emoticon emoticon-smileysad" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.png" alt="Smiley Sad" title="Smiley Sad" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;we were able to set/get it in R77.30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21613#M1660</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T12:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21614#M1661</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus why I think a TAC case is needed to investigate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21614#M1661</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T16:47:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21615#M1662</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep, as mentioned in original post - case lodged and all logs provided. &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Time for weekend. Hopefully it's fixed when I return on Monday morning&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:59:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21615#M1662</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T17:59:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21616#M1663</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hard to admit but it was proper Homer situation.. Forgot that we ad turned off AntiBot blade few months ago and you need one of medium path blades to be active for XFF removal to work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/69991_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 06:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21616#M1663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T06:09:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21617#M1664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep, that will definitely do it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21617#M1664</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T14:25:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HTTP XFF header not being removed in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21618#M1665</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You meant bang myself on the head? haha yep!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 15:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/HTTP-XFF-header-not-being-removed-in-R80-10/m-p/21618#M1665</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T15:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

