<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Force route destination in a ISP Redundancy with Load Balancer in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Force-route-destination-in-a-ISP-Redundancy-with-Load-Balancer/m-p/112620#M15653</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe this has a significant performance impact.&lt;BR /&gt;It used to be that ISP Redundancy disabled SecureXL, but I don't believe that's the case any longer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 01:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-07T01:30:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Force route destination in a ISP Redundancy with Load Balancer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Force-route-destination-in-a-ISP-Redundancy-with-Load-Balancer/m-p/112482#M15613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I don't shure if name title post is completly adequate, I hope description of my problem clarify it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;We have:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;01 vSec R80.40 standalone firewall.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;02 Different ISP providers (ISP-A, ISP-B)&lt;BR /&gt;Firewall has ISP redundancy enable in load balancer mode. (ISP-A weight=30, ISP-B weight=5).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Our requiremen to resolve:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need to login into I&lt;U&gt;SP B&lt;/U&gt; provider web portal to review payments stuff, however&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;ISP B&lt;/U&gt; web portal don't&amp;nbsp; load&amp;nbsp; when we access throught connection link &lt;U&gt;ISP-A&lt;/U&gt;, and because &lt;U&gt;ISP-A&lt;/U&gt; weight is greater than &lt;U&gt;ISP-B&lt;/U&gt; weight, most of the time we get access to internet throught &lt;U&gt;ISP-A&lt;/U&gt; link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My fix:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did create a route with &lt;U&gt;IPaddress-ISP-WebPortal&lt;/U&gt; as destination and &lt;U&gt;IPaddress-ISP-B-gateways&lt;/U&gt; as Gateway, so always we need to connect to such site, FW will route that trafficc throught ISP-B link gateway. This fix is working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My doubts:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any impact on FW performance?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any impact on ISP Redundancy? I known that when &lt;U&gt;ISP-B&lt;/U&gt; link is down, we will never get access to &lt;U&gt;ISP-B&lt;/U&gt; web portal.&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any better fix ...best practice to resolve my requirement?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 18:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Force-route-destination-in-a-ISP-Redundancy-with-Load-Balancer/m-p/112482#M15613</guid>
      <dc:creator>LuisSP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-04T18:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Force route destination in a ISP Redundancy with Load Balancer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Force-route-destination-in-a-ISP-Redundancy-with-Load-Balancer/m-p/112620#M15653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe this has a significant performance impact.&lt;BR /&gt;It used to be that ISP Redundancy disabled SecureXL, but I don't believe that's the case any longer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 01:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Force-route-destination-in-a-ISP-Redundancy-with-Load-Balancer/m-p/112620#M15653</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-07T01:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

