<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: GNAT curiosity in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112149#M15551</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well in my case with 3 workers I guess that I could *3 the pool size which is quite good.&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps there may be a negative performance impact more noticeable with less workers ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 17:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Luis_Miguel_Mig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-01T17:20:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GNAT curiosity</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112111#M15549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was looking at the new GNAT feature and considering it as something good to have but then I realized that it is not recommended if the number of core workers is less than 6.&lt;BR /&gt;I am just curious about what is the reason.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In my environment I am running 3 core workers for example.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk165153" target="_blank"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk165153&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112111#M15549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luis_Miguel_Mig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T14:02:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GNAT curiosity</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112147#M15550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It may be that when you don’t have enough cores to work with, there isn’t enough of a benefit of GNAT.&lt;BR /&gt;It’s a good question, though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 16:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112147#M15550</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T16:57:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GNAT curiosity</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112149#M15551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well in my case with 3 workers I guess that I could *3 the pool size which is quite good.&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps there may be a negative performance impact more noticeable with less workers ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 17:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112149#M15551</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luis_Miguel_Mig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T17:20:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GNAT curiosity</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112181#M15558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The pooling of source ports for Hide NAT between the various worker cores will be statically assigned if there are less than 6 worker cores.&amp;nbsp; In this case it is more likely for a certain worker core to run out of source ports if it happens to draw a large number of connections from the Dynamic Dispatcher that are Hide NATted behind the same outside IP address.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When there are 6 or more worker cores present, Hide NAT source port pooling is fully dynamic between all the worker cores.&amp;nbsp; This effect was mentioned in the second edition of my book (because it required a manual kernel tweak to enable dynamic allocation), but removed from the third edition once dynamic allocation became automatically enabled with 6+ worker cores defined.&amp;nbsp; See here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk103656&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=CoreXL%22" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk103656: Dynamic NAT port allocation feature&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/GNAT-curiosity/m-p/112181#M15558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T19:51:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

