<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 802.3ad Transmit Hash Policy in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/802-3ad-Transmit-Hash-Policy/m-p/110291#M15152</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking for some guidance on interface bond configuration facing cisco switches. Customer has a cisco switch configured with a port-channel and load balancing set to src-mac connected into a bonded interface configured as lacp 802.3ad, transmit-hash-policy layer2.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The switch was recently introduced into the environment and we are seeing stats on the cisco interfaces that belong to the port-channel which suggest 1st interface is transmitting and the 2nd interface receiving. Therefore we looking to change the load balancing setting on the switch to "src-dst-ip" however I am also questioning the configuration on the fw bond interface. Configured for 802.3ad, is the "transmit-has-policy layer2" setting even relevant (if the bond is not configured for XOR), or should this be changed to layer3+4?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nucusr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-09T10:49:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>802.3ad Transmit Hash Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/802-3ad-Transmit-Hash-Policy/m-p/110291#M15152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking for some guidance on interface bond configuration facing cisco switches. Customer has a cisco switch configured with a port-channel and load balancing set to src-mac connected into a bonded interface configured as lacp 802.3ad, transmit-hash-policy layer2.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;The switch was recently introduced into the environment and we are seeing stats on the cisco interfaces that belong to the port-channel which suggest 1st interface is transmitting and the 2nd interface receiving. Therefore we looking to change the load balancing setting on the switch to "src-dst-ip" however I am also questioning the configuration on the fw bond interface. Configured for 802.3ad, is the "transmit-has-policy layer2" setting even relevant (if the bond is not configured for XOR), or should this be changed to layer3+4?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/802-3ad-Transmit-Hash-Policy/m-p/110291#M15152</guid>
      <dc:creator>nucusr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-09T10:49:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 802.3ad Transmit Hash Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/802-3ad-Transmit-Hash-Policy/m-p/110296#M15153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;LACP layer3+4 would be my recommendation if changing the switch to src-dst-ip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Depending on version also suggested a Jumbo including&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;PMTR-60804&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/802-3ad-Transmit-Hash-Policy/m-p/110296#M15153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-09T11:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

