<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SecureXL in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109536#M14930</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The SecureXL connections table '&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-PTG/CLI/fwaccel-conns.htm" target="_self"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;' shows all connections handled by SecureXL while the &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-x-Performance-Tuning-Tip-Connection-Table/td-p/41581" target="_self"&gt;connections kernel table&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;also shows those not handled by SecureXL. Also check&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk104468" target="_self"&gt;sk104468&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-02T07:48:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109521#M14929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have doubt related to SecureXL .If we have already connection table in firewall kernel,then what is the need of&amp;nbsp; maintaining secureXL connection table?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109521#M14929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ratnesh_Singh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T07:28:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109536#M14930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The SecureXL connections table '&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_PerformanceTuning_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-PTG/CLI/fwaccel-conns.htm" target="_self"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;' shows all connections handled by SecureXL while the &lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/R80-x-Performance-Tuning-Tip-Connection-Table/td-p/41581" target="_self"&gt;connections kernel table&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;also shows those not handled by SecureXL. Also check&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk104468" target="_self"&gt;sk104468&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 07:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109536#M14930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T07:48:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109550#M14931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Look here: &lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" style="max-width: 840px;" href="https://supportcenter.us.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk98348&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Security" target="_blank"&gt;sk98348: Best Practices - Security Gateway Performance&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 09:37:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109550#M14931</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T09:37:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109567#M14932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When a packet arrives at the firewall, it always hits the SecureXL Implementation Module (sim) kernel driver running on an SND/IRQ core first.&amp;nbsp; In R80.20+ if the packet's attributes match a connection in the SecureXL state table (&lt;STRONG&gt;fwaccel conns&lt;/STRONG&gt; - in other words SecureXL is handling that connection), SecureXL commences direct processing on that packet.&amp;nbsp; If the packet does not match a connection in the SecureXL state table because it is the first packet of a new connection, or it is part of an existing unaccelerated connection that is not being handled by SecureXL, the packet is sent up to a Firewall Worker/Instance which is maintaining its own state table (&lt;STRONG&gt;fw tab -t connections&lt;/STRONG&gt;).&amp;nbsp; There is a notification mechanism to sync certain operations between the two separate tables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109567#M14932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T14:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109576#M14934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's probably worth noting the SecureXL table is simpler, so it's faster to check. That's ultimately the reason for maintaining the tables separately.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:44:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109576#M14934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T14:44:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecureXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109601#M14938</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of the original design goals of SecureXL was to provide acceleration for connections in hardware independent from the main CPU of the system.&lt;BR /&gt;This necessitates a separate connection table for the accelerator device itself.&lt;BR /&gt;There are no hardware accelerator cards that we sell currently, though they have been sold in the past.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 20:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/SecureXL/m-p/109601#M14938</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T20:33:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

