<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best topology for Check Point in HPE ProCurve) based core network. Comments and opinions please. in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109195#M14804</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not strictly a Check Point only question, but since it is a part of the infrastructure, I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible issues and gotchas I may run into if implementing this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network" style="width: 980px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10391iFCE1E37DC2078573/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="HPE_CP_VSF_DT.png" alt="HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The devices in the center are Aruba 5412R zl2 in Virtual Switch Framework configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the right are the two switches running same OS in Distributed Trunking mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On he left is the pair of independent switches.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-28T17:11:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best topology for Check Point in HPE ProCurve) based core network. Comments and opinions please.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109195#M14804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not strictly a Check Point only question, but since it is a part of the infrastructure, I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible issues and gotchas I may run into if implementing this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network" style="width: 980px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10391iFCE1E37DC2078573/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="HPE_CP_VSF_DT.png" alt="HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;HPE/Aruba/Check Point Core Network&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The devices in the center are Aruba 5412R zl2 in Virtual Switch Framework configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the right are the two switches running same OS in Distributed Trunking mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On he left is the pair of independent switches.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109195#M14804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T17:11:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best topology for Check Point in HPE ProCurve) based core network. Comments and opinions please.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109273#M14817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Guess it depends a lot on your scope and design objectives.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some may prefer not to have the shared L2 domain for the internal &amp;amp; externals zones of the firewall. If the central switches are also terminating L3 do they support VRFs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109273#M14817</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T10:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best topology for Check Point in HPE ProCurve) based core network. Comments and opinions please.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109309#M14824</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The HPE ArubaOS-Switch series (formerly known as ProCurve) does not support VRF.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The A-series of HPE-Aruba running ArubaOS/ArubaOS (MAS) support VRF, but are not part of this design (client's requirements).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So in case of this design, all routing is done by firewalls, but you do have an ability to have a single routing domain on VSF, if you need to bypass Check Point for some traffic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Best-topology-for-Check-Point-in-HPE-ProCurve-based-core-network/m-p/109309#M14824</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T18:07:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

