<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic recommendation for redundant access from CP cluster to Azure cloud in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/recommendation-for-redundant-access-from-CP-cluster-to-Azure/m-p/109089#M14787</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;existing CP customer working on how to leverage TWO available ISP circuits to maximize uptime and connection to AZURE cloud infrastructure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The concern is clusterXL ISP redundancy has site-to-site VPN failover limitations with 3rd party VPN's (Azure).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight and references for education and architecture strategy would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could solution possibly include Cluster XL Active-Active mode (introduced with R80.40)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;References:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-CXLG/ISP-Redundancy-on-Cluster.htm?tocpath=Advanced%20Features%20and%20Procedures%7CISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Cluster%7C_____0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;R80.40 ClusterXL ISP Redundancy HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Network-Security-IaaS/White-Paper-Security-Architecture-References-for-Public-Cloud/m-p/102525#M2260" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Security Architecture IaaS Public Cloud HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-CXLG/Active-Active-Mode.htm?tocpath=Active-Active%20Mode%20in%20ClusterXL%7C_____0#Active-Active_Mode_in_ClusterXL" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;R81 ClusterXL Active-Active Mode HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Garrett_DirSec</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-27T22:10:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>recommendation for redundant access from CP cluster to Azure cloud</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/recommendation-for-redundant-access-from-CP-cluster-to-Azure/m-p/109089#M14787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;existing CP customer working on how to leverage TWO available ISP circuits to maximize uptime and connection to AZURE cloud infrastructure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The concern is clusterXL ISP redundancy has site-to-site VPN failover limitations with 3rd party VPN's (Azure).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight and references for education and architecture strategy would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could solution possibly include Cluster XL Active-Active mode (introduced with R80.40)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;References:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-CXLG/ISP-Redundancy-on-Cluster.htm?tocpath=Advanced%20Features%20and%20Procedures%7CISP%20Redundancy%20on%20a%20Cluster%7C_____0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;R80.40 ClusterXL ISP Redundancy HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Network-Security-IaaS/White-Paper-Security-Architecture-References-for-Public-Cloud/m-p/102525#M2260" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Security Architecture IaaS Public Cloud HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-CXLG/Active-Active-Mode.htm?tocpath=Active-Active%20Mode%20in%20ClusterXL%7C_____0#Active-Active_Mode_in_ClusterXL" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;R81 ClusterXL Active-Active Mode HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/recommendation-for-redundant-access-from-CP-cluster-to-Azure/m-p/109089#M14787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Garrett_DirSec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-27T22:10:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

