<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: &amp;quot;Verdict Determined By&amp;quot; field missing in R80.10 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24619#M13707</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Verdict Determined By" field has been modified in R80.10 SmartLog and you can see same information in "Malicious Activity Determined By" field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shivam_Goel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-07T08:49:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Verdict Determined By" field missing in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24617#M13705</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of my customer recently migrated from R77.30 to R80.10. setup includes 23800 &amp;amp; 2000X&amp;nbsp;TE appliance for remote emulation. R77.30 Emulation log used to show "Verdict Determined By" field whereas same found missing in R80.10 logging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has R80.10 retired this field or stopped reading the field value ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Suggestion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/70026_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/70027_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:16:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24617#M13705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajesh_Sawant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T16:16:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Verdict Determined By" field missing in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24618#M13706</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like "Not Vulnerable OS" has the same information (just from your screenshots).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I imagine a different field would show up if the verdict was not benign.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 20:14:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24618#M13706</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T20:14:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Verdict Determined By" field missing in R80.10</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24619#M13707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Verdict Determined By" field has been modified in R80.10 SmartLog and you can see same information in "Malicious Activity Determined By" field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 08:49:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/quot-Verdict-Determined-By-quot-field-missing-in-R80-10/m-p/24619#M13707</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shivam_Goel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-07T08:49:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

