<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ClusterXL Sync Interface in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18123#M1362</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it allowed / a good idea to use a cross-over cable for the sync-interface, e.g. when both units are side-by-side in the same rack?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christian_Koehl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-10T07:02:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ClusterXL Sync Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18123#M1362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it allowed / a good idea to use a cross-over cable for the sync-interface, e.g. when both units are side-by-side in the same rack?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18123#M1362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christian_Koehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T07:02:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL Sync Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18124#M1363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check Point is actually recommending a cross-cable for sync these days. As for the same rack, consider putting them on two different power lines, if you can. Otherwise, I do not see an issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18124#M1363</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T11:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ClusterXL Sync Interface</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18125#M1364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Straight or crossover shouldn't matter as ports these days should do auto sense. From what I've seen. As long as appliances are not too old&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ClusterXL-Sync-Interface/m-p/18125#M1364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaspars_Zibarts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T20:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

