<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: core affinity question. in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17932#M1357</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you see any CPU usage on CPU 1 (e.g. with cpview or similar)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-20T19:32:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17929#M1354</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Installed a new 5600 cluster recently and not seeing the expected result in regards to core allocation.&amp;nbsp; I gave corexl a 2/2 split, but seems like SND/IRQ only has 1 core assigned:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fw ctl affinity -l&lt;BR /&gt;eth1: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth5: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth2: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth3: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth4: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;fw_0: CPU 3&lt;BR /&gt;fw_1: CPU 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RX-DRP is zero, so i'm not really worried, just wondering.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of my 4800s with a 2/2 split looks correct:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fw ctl affinity -l&lt;BR /&gt;eth5: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth1: CPU 1&lt;BR /&gt;eth6: CPU 1&lt;BR /&gt;eth2: CPU 1&lt;BR /&gt;eth7: CPU 1&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-01: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth3: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth1-02: CPU 1&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;eth4: CPU 0&lt;BR /&gt;fw_0: CPU 3&lt;BR /&gt;fw_1: CPU 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:30:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17929#M1354</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-19T20:30:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17930#M1355</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's weird that CPU 1 doesn't even show up in your fw ctl affinity output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version/jumbo hotfix level?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17930#M1355</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T19:04:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17931#M1356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;R77.30&amp;nbsp; take 338&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17931#M1356</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T19:08:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17932#M1357</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you see any CPU usage on CPU 1 (e.g. with cpview or similar)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17932#M1357</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T19:32:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17933#M1358</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i sit on the overview screen of cpview, every now and then CPU1 will pop up for a cycle or two.&amp;nbsp; CPU1 doesn't seem to be doing much - but could that be because there isn't really anything more to do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This 5600 cluster is a loaner from my sales team to replace a 4400 cluster that was experiencing ~3% RX-DRP.&amp;nbsp; Since replacing with a 5600, there have been 0 RX-DRPs, and it's running incredibly smooth with low CPU usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17933#M1358</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T20:13:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17934#M1359</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if /proc/interrupts adds any value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/74732_interrupts.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17934#M1359</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_TK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T20:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: core affinity question.</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17935#M1360</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's clear from /proc/interrupts Core1 isn't doing much of anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd open a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/core-affinity-question/m-p/17935#M1360</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-20T22:08:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

