<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35778#M13436</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the question was not if it is supported, but if it can be recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also heard that MTA should perform much better and&amp;nbsp;that's why we're considering an update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I don't know anyone who can confirm this, because he has already seen it in productive operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-26T09:23:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35774#M13432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been asked to upgrade a TE100X system from R77.30 to R80.20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our customer heard "rumors" that it will run a lot better with R80.20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am careful with such things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody have a TE100X running with R80.20? Is it recommended by Checkpoint itself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35774#M13432</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-25T15:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35775#M13433</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To my knowledge the GAiA version for TE Appliances is still at R77.30.&amp;nbsp; You can integrate it with R80.20, but to my knowledge there is no R80.20 for TEX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35775#M13433</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Douglas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-25T18:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35776#M13434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use R80.20 and according to&amp;nbsp;what I've heard it should perform much better regarding MTA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 14px;"&gt;Starting from November 2018, has been added&amp;nbsp;support for Check Point R80.10 and R80.20 -&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-weight: 400;"&gt;sk106210&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35776#M13434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin_Raska</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T07:51:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35777#M13435</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/79404_pastedImage_3.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#Chinmaya Naik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:08:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35777#M13435</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chinmaya_Naik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T08:08:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35778#M13436</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the question was not if it is supported, but if it can be recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also heard that MTA should perform much better and&amp;nbsp;that's why we're considering an update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I don't know anyone who can confirm this, because he has already seen it in productive operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:23:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35778#M13436</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T09:23:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35779#M13437</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using the R80.20 ISO for TE for POC purpose and we&amp;nbsp;also enable the MTA&amp;nbsp; and its working fine. But still, some use cases&amp;nbsp;are pending from our end.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Link:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/thread/11590"&gt;Block Malicious Unknown File type attachment (MTA) (TE) (R80.20)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;We still not using R80.20 on production. but in R80.10 is running on production for some customer and its working fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the below enhancement for MTA in R80.20 ISO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL class="" style="color: #333333; border: 0px; margin: 3pt 0px 0pt; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px;"&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MTA (Mail Transfer Agent)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;UL class="" style="border: 0px; font-weight: inherit; margin: 3pt 0px 0pt; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px;"&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MTA monitoring, e-mails history views &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;and&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; statistics, current e-mails queue status and actions performed on e-mails in &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;queue&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MTA configuration enhancements&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;UL class="" style="border: 0px; font-weight: inherit; margin: 3pt 0px 0pt; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px;"&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Setting a domain object as next hop.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Ability to create an access rule to allow SMTP traffic to a Security Gateway.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Create a dedicated Advanced Threat Prevention rule for MTA.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MTA enforcement enhancements&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;UL class="" style="border: 0px; font-weight: inherit; margin: 3pt 0px 0pt; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px;"&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Replacing malicious links in an email with a configurable template.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;Configurable&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; format for textual attachments replacement.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Ability to add a customized text to malicious e-mails' body or subject.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Tagging malicious-mails using X-header&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI class="" style="color: #000000; background-color: inherit; border: 0px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0cm; margin: 3pt 0pt 0pt; padding: 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #808080;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Sending a copy of the malicious e-mail to a predefined recipients list&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#Chinmaya Naik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35779#M13437</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chinmaya_Naik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T10:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35780#M13438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, thank you very much, this helps a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to sum it up: No one is using R80.20 on a TE100X Appliance in production.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe I'll give it a try. Have to ask the customer...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35780#M13438</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T13:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35781#M13439</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hii&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also put soon on production (R80.20) once we completed some usecases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please update in case any issue you face.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#Chinmaya Naik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35781#M13439</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chinmaya_Naik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T14:04:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35782#M13440</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35782#M13440</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Douglas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T15:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35783#M13441</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I asked our Sandblast Man at Checkpoint and was been told that there are a lot of MTA improvements in R80.xx. See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://supportcontent.checkpoint.com/solutions?id=sk123174" title="http://supportcontent.checkpoint.com/solutions?id=sk123174"&gt;Mail Transfer Agent Update - What&amp;amp;apos;s New&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/35783#M13441</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T15:11:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R80.20 on TE100X - Recommended?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/49008#M13442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Customer running on R80.20. No issues so far...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/R80-20-on-TE100X-Recommended/m-p/49008#M13442</guid>
      <dc:creator>dj0Nz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-28T11:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

