<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: issue with IKE weak negotiations on R80.20 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62411#M12435</link>
    <description>Specifically, which ciphers do they claim is being offered?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-10T23:03:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>issue with IKE weak negotiations on R80.20</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62387#M12434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone shed any light for us, we have regular pen tests from our partner, we have a firewall that they say is responding to weak IKE transformations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have IKEv2 enabled on this said firewall using AES256 and SHA256 but they still say its weak.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other firewalls are configured the same but don't have any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62387#M12434</guid>
      <dc:creator>carl_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T14:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: issue with IKE weak negotiations on R80.20</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62411#M12435</link>
      <description>Specifically, which ciphers do they claim is being offered?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62411#M12435</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-10T23:03:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: issue with IKE weak negotiations on R80.20</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62808#M12436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The go-to SK for audit scan results is this one: &lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" style="max-width: 840px;" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk100647&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=All%22" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk100647: Check Point response to common false positives scanning results&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could this be what they are referring to specifically for IKE, which doesn't apply to Check Point firewalls anyway: &lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" style="max-width: 840px;" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk134572&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=IPSec" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;sk134572: Check Point response to Bleichenbacher oracle cryptographic attack (IKEv1/IKEv2)&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2019 19:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/issue-with-IKE-weak-negotiations-on-R80-20/m-p/62808#M12436</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-15T19:07:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

