<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Identity Collector sending to cluster best practice in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Identity-Collector-sending-to-cluster-best-practice/m-p/63897#M12313</link>
    <description>First option seems most reasonable and yes the information is synced.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-28T22:16:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Identity Collector sending to cluster best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Identity-Collector-sending-to-cluster-best-practice/m-p/63867#M12312</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm working on standing up some new Identity collector servers.&amp;nbsp; What is the best practice for sending identity info from the IDC to the firewall cluster?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Options&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Configure 1 gateway per cluster with the VIP of the cluster.&amp;nbsp; If this is correct, does the primary member share the identity information with the secondary member?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Configure an entry for each member of the cluster. (eg, a 2 member cluster would have 2 gateways configured).&amp;nbsp; This assumes that the cluster members don't automatically share identity information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which option is correct, or is there a different way I should configure this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Identity-Collector-sending-to-cluster-best-practice/m-p/63867#M12312</guid>
      <dc:creator>phlrnnr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-27T19:57:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identity Collector sending to cluster best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Identity-Collector-sending-to-cluster-best-practice/m-p/63897#M12313</link>
      <description>First option seems most reasonable and yes the information is synced.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2019 22:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Identity-Collector-sending-to-cluster-best-practice/m-p/63897#M12313</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-28T22:16:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

