<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISP redudancy over vpn in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73356#M11802</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have cluster on one cma with dual ISP. And it's creating tunnel to the site B in other cma , how we need if one ISP goes down other will take over&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nishant12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-25T10:16:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73356#M11802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have cluster on one cma with dual ISP. And it's creating tunnel to the site B in other cma , how we need if one ISP goes down other will take over&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73356#M11802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nishant12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-25T10:16:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73380#M11803</link>
      <description>This is covered in the ClusterXL Docs.&lt;BR /&gt;See: &lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.30/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.30_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73380#M11803</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-26T14:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73399#M11804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry but I am not able to find any topic related to this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding to my first comment, VPN site which connected through same CMA Is working fine but site which is connected through different cma will not failover to other ISP&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 02:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73399#M11804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nishant12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-27T02:31:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73400#M11805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Checkpoint version is R80 .10&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 02:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73400#M11805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nishant12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-27T02:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73586#M11806</link>
      <description>Look up the phrase ISP Redundancy in: &lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.10_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/html_frameset.htm&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73586#M11806</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-28T16:10:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISP redudancy over vpn</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73606#M11807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Configure as External Check Point Gateway, then add both interfaces to the Topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Under the VPN Link Selection configure for Use Probing,&amp;nbsp; High Availability and configure to Probe for the Two IP with the Primary marked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That way you will probe the two IP and as long as the Primary responds will use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If doesn't will use the Second Iink for VPN.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/ISP-redudancy-over-vpn/m-p/73606#M11807</guid>
      <dc:creator>mdjmcnally</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-28T18:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

