<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Url categorization issue specific sites in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75333#M11639</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. Yes only solution for now was to allow ad-banners.at.&lt;BR /&gt;I couldn't find the redirect to ad-banner.at or similiar sites on this website "fontawesome.com". Other websites are affected too. So i think there is another issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also what's the best practice then to filter out web-ads?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>D_W</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-14T19:04:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/74699#M11637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;quick question about Application and URLFiltering without HTTPS Inspection on R80.10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We block category "web-advertisement" and at the moment when someone tries to access &lt;A href="https://fontawesome.com" target="_blank"&gt;https://fontawesome.com&lt;/A&gt; it get's blocked and we only see that "ad-balancer.at" in the SmartLog is getting blocked in that session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone with the same behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KR&lt;BR /&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/74699#M11637</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-10T15:25:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/74702#M11638</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="URLF.jpg" style="width: 480px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4401i69CD11D5F6027430/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="URLF.jpg" alt="URLF.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like Check Point's only categorization for this site is "Computers / Internet". Are users attempting to access it by directly entering in that URL? Or are they searching for it and clicking on a search result?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One side effect I've seen from blocking the "Web-Advertisement" category is that many of the "top" links on Google (which are actually Ad hits) will not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If they are going directly to the URL, it could be that some portion of the site is redirecting to some ad or click-tracker before going to the actual webpage. If that is happening, there may not be much you can do besides white-listing "ad-balancer.at". Which I'm sure you don't want to do, but a poorly engineered website may not leave you a choice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/74702#M11638</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Taney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-10T15:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75333#M11639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. Yes only solution for now was to allow ad-banners.at.&lt;BR /&gt;I couldn't find the redirect to ad-banner.at or similiar sites on this website "fontawesome.com". Other websites are affected too. So i think there is another issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also what's the best practice then to filter out web-ads?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75333#M11639</guid>
      <dc:creator>D_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-14T19:04:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75339#M11640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I haven't found a better way to get around this besides accepting the reality that blocking this category will break a few websites and some exceptions may have to be put in. The way I see it, there is so much ad traffic on the Internet that, even with a few exceptions, you are probably still blocking more than you'll end up allowing by not filtering the category entirely.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75339#M11640</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Taney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-14T21:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75340#M11641</link>
      <description>There are many browser plugins that do this quite effectively.&lt;BR /&gt;Obviously that doesn't scale to the network very well. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tongue:"&gt;😛&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75340#M11641</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-14T21:21:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Url categorization issue specific sites</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75341#M11642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have Identity Awareness configured, you could also write an Identity rule to allow those ad-sites for the users that need the website to work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Url-categorization-issue-specific-sites/m-p/75341#M11642</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Taney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-14T21:28:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

