<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90421#M10981</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;so there is no way for 2 cisco routers on either side of a checkpoint to share their eigrp updates through the firewall?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-02T17:00:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90356#M10979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So i came across this sk that explains how to allow ospf,rip,igrp,bgp updates but i do not see an explanation for eigrp? would i create a host object for 224.0.0.10 for eigrp (since thats the ip it uses for multicast updates) and for the rest do the same as say ospf for which is explained in the sk? and one more question regarding ospf, what is the 224.0.0.1 ip? i do know that ospf uses 224.0.0.5 , 224.0.0.6 for updates but what is 224.0.0.1? Also i do not see an "eigrp" under services, i see ospf, bgp,etc but no eigrp, im assuming i need to select igrp?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Running R80.20 by the way.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Sk being talked about-&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk39960#Allowing%20OSPF" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk39960#Allowing%20OSPF&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 02:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90356#M10979</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-02T02:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90386#M10980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EIGRP is a Cisco proprietary protocol so you won't see anything about it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for , 224.0.0.1 :&amp;nbsp;The All Hosts multicast group addresses all hosts on the same network segment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;BR /&gt;Paul&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90386#M10980</guid>
      <dc:creator>funkylicious</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-02T09:36:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90421#M10981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;so there is no way for 2 cisco routers on either side of a checkpoint to share their eigrp updates through the firewall?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90421#M10981</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-02T17:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90436#M10982</link>
      <description>You could create a separate service object for ip protocol 88 and see what happens or can leave Any ...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 20:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90436#M10982</guid>
      <dc:creator>funkylicious</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-02T20:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90439#M10983</link>
      <description>ok thanks nothning too important as i was just trying out some routing protocols in my gns3 lab, decided to use ospf instead which is better i guess.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 20:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90439#M10983</guid>
      <dc:creator>kb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-02T20:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90447#M10984</link>
      <description>EIGRP is a multicast protocol.&lt;BR /&gt;In addition to allowing the traffic in the Access Policy, you would need to set up something like PIM to forward the traffic as this traffic is not forwarded by default.&lt;BR /&gt;It might be easier to use a routing protocol that can operate unicast.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90447#M10984</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-03T00:48:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: allowing dynamic routing protocol updates through checkpoint firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90465#M10985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Multicast traffic can be passed through, there are per-interface settings about that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 08:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/allowing-dynamic-routing-protocol-updates-through-checkpoint/m-p/90465#M10985</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Val_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-03T08:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

