<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Office 365 in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15344#M1081</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should set the office rule above the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Viele Gr??e&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel Meier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;//Sent Mobile with Check Point Secure Workspace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nüüül</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-13T15:55:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15339#M1076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are planning to spin up more services to Office 365 in the near future.&amp;nbsp; There have been several questions our O365 team has concerning the outbound browsing FW.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use a single outbound browsing NAT and the concern is the number of ports used on that single address could be exhausted.&amp;nbsp; Will this be a problem for O365?&amp;nbsp; Microsoft recommended to have multiple outbound NATs to mitigate this.&amp;nbsp; Are multiple outbound NATs possible?&amp;nbsp; I thought I read somewhere that if the Destinations are different then you would get sets of ports for each destination IPs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to monitor or get an idea of current number of ports being used by our single overloaded NAT?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to get any type of reporting around Office 365 traffic outbound?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions, links, articles are welcomed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15339#M1076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Ng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T13:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15340#M1077</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i remember there was a document with recommendations for x to y users to use one or more hide NAT addresses, as there may be about 20-40 sessions opened per user.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will check and post it here soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if I remember correct, I.e. for more than 1000 users they recommended more IPs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there it is:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.00pt;"&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/enterprise/nat-support-with-office-365" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/enterprise/nat-support-with-office-365&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15340#M1077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nüüül</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T21:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15341#M1078</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Daniel.&amp;nbsp; We would have more than a&amp;nbsp;1000 users easily.&amp;nbsp; Could a NAT pool to replace our hidden NAT?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15341#M1078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Ng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T12:22:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15342#M1079</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, NAT Pool would be an idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or a dedicated NAT Rule for O365, when on R80.20 using the updateble objects as Destination and Natting to one dedicated IP for O365&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when on R80.10 you might want to use the script described here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/docs/DOC-3013" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/docs/DOC-3013&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for getting Firewall Objects for O365 on&amp;nbsp; Checkpoint.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:05:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15342#M1079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nüüül</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-21T09:05:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15343#M1080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;just to clarify.&amp;nbsp; The NATs could look like one of the rules below or even a combo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/76371_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15343#M1080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Ng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T15:48:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Office 365</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15344#M1081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should set the office rule above the other.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Viele Gr??e&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel Meier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;//Sent Mobile with Check Point Secure Workspace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:55:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Office-365/m-p/15344#M1081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nüüül</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T15:55:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

