<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice in Firewall &amp; Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283054#M106969</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am setting up a brand- Check Point environment for a customer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a practice for a stable production environment I plan to use R82.10 along with the latest Recommended Jumbo Hotfix because that is the official production release that is recommended.. Since R82.20 is now available I want to make sure with the community before I decide on the final setup.&amp;nbsp;The deployment mode is ElasticXL with VSNext&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please let me know if using R82.10 is still the practice for long-term stability and easier support for a customer build right now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, for your time and help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yeruel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-30T08:13:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283054#M106969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am setting up a brand- Check Point environment for a customer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a practice for a stable production environment I plan to use R82.10 along with the latest Recommended Jumbo Hotfix because that is the official production release that is recommended.. Since R82.20 is now available I want to make sure with the community before I decide on the final setup.&amp;nbsp;The deployment mode is ElasticXL with VSNext&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please let me know if using R82.10 is still the practice for long-term stability and easier support for a customer build right now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, for your time and help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283054#M106969</guid>
      <dc:creator>yeruel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-30T08:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283066#M106975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Had the same discussion with the local Check Point team last week. We need to upgrade a customer from 81.20 to R82.x and what would be the best version? Also ElasticXL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have decided to upgrade to the recommended version with the latest available hotfix. As far as we know, R82.20 does not contain features for ElasticXL and VSNext you would miss if you go to R82.10. And R82.20 does not have a hotfix yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unless you really need and want the R82.20 features, I would go for a recommended version with avaiblable hotfixes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martijn&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283066#M106975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-30T14:06:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283081#M106982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I support like&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3058"&gt;@Martijn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote stay with a recommended version in a production environment. We started ElasticXL with VSNext in a really early state and had a lot of trouble with bugs and limited features, but now with the latest hotfix running R82.10 is a stable release.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283081#M106982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T04:53:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283104#M106994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would only ever deploy the Recommended product release (which is R82.10 with the latest Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator) for any customer. CheckPoint always prioritise the Recommended Release when targeting bugfixes etc. R82.20 is very, very new and not mature enough for customer deployment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 15:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283104#M106994</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccsjnw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T15:13:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Customer Deployment: R82.10 versus R82.20 Production Best Practice</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283112#M106999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I will be upgrading some R81.10 VSX clusters to R82.10; R82.20, even though its tempting is just not viable at this stage.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I plan to do a clean rebuild, apply the latest "wide adoption" Jumbo and then 'vsx_reconfigure'.&amp;nbsp; I personally find this a more predictable path then conducting an in-place upgrade.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 17:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-Security-Management/New-Customer-Deployment-R82-10-versus-R82-20-Production-Best/m-p/283112#M106999</guid>
      <dc:creator>genisis__</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T17:12:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

