<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments? in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277139#M105479</link>
    <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That makes a lot of sense to me, especially considering this environment involves banking-related communications where stability and low operational impact are critical.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on your feedback, I think the best approach for this case will be to start conservatively:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Use a custom IPS profile&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Keep everything in Detect mode initially&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Avoid enabling additional categories under “Protections to activate” for now&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Focus on monitoring, visibility, and understanding the real traffic patterns first&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Then, over time, I’ll tune the profile progressively based on:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;actual applications/services observed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;triggered protections&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;false positives&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and overall operational impact&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Once we have enough telemetry and confidence, we can gradually move selected protections to Prevent.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Appreciate the insights — they helped me rethink the approach in a more operational and less “enable everything just in case” way &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 15:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jennyado</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-19T15:30:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277068#M105447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I’m currently working on hardening IPS profiles in Check Point for a banking/financial environment, and I have a specific question regarding:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Threat Prevention Profile → IPS → Additional Activation → Protections to activate&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My goal is to build a custom IPS profile tailored for the banking sector, but I haven’t been able to find official documentation that clearly explains all available categories/tags and the purpose behind each one.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Right now, I’m evaluating which categories would make sense to additionally activate for financial environments.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’d really appreciate hearing real-world production experience from others working with similar environments:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Which categories have worked well for banking environments?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you know of any SKs, documentation, or internal references that explain the meaning of each category/tag in detail?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277068#M105447</guid>
      <dc:creator>jennyado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-18T20:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277087#M105454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no real guide line because every bank company is different. Meaning one bank is maybe using Adobe a lot and the other one is not. Or maybe one has F5 running and the other does not have. I think you get the point. I never use this feature. more important for me is to pick between the 3 default profiles: Optimized, Recommended, Strict. All activate protections based on different settings. For example strict profile will activate protections , severity Low or above.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditor_2317cc789a10c4Lesley_0" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 668px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34259i76CF2F1A652134F8/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 451px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34260i2FE1846433D9CCD7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditor_2317cc789a10c4Lesley_1" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34261iDD1B17B1D583BD26/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 07:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277087#M105454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-19T07:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277088#M105455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/73547"&gt;@Lesley&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;each banking environment is different from the other, in case you have to perform an analysis of which systems/software are used in the bank, and in case prepare IPS profile for specific traffic and communications, to enable only the needed signatures.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 07:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277088#M105455</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonemantovani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-19T07:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277139#M105479</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That makes a lot of sense to me, especially considering this environment involves banking-related communications where stability and low operational impact are critical.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Based on your feedback, I think the best approach for this case will be to start conservatively:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Use a custom IPS profile&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Keep everything in Detect mode initially&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Avoid enabling additional categories under “Protections to activate” for now&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Focus on monitoring, visibility, and understanding the real traffic patterns first&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Then, over time, I’ll tune the profile progressively based on:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL data-spread="false"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;actual applications/services observed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;triggered protections&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;false positives&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and overall operational impact&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Once we have enough telemetry and confidence, we can gradually move selected protections to Prevent.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Appreciate the insights — they helped me rethink the approach in a more operational and less “enable everything just in case” way &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 15:30:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277139#M105479</guid>
      <dc:creator>jennyado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-19T15:30:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended IPS “Additional Activation” Categories for Banking/Financial Environments?</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277143#M105482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Worth to consider autonomous threat prevention with monitor only profile:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R82/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R82_ThreatPrevention_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-TPG/Autonomous-Threat-Prevention.htm?tocpath=Autonomous%20Threat%20Prevention%7C_____0" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R82/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R82_ThreatPrevention_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-TPG/Autonomous-Threat-Prevention.htm?tocpath=Autonomous%20Threat%20Prevention%7C_____0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Monitor Profile&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Detect mode" security profile to generate logs and reports.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 16:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Recommended-IPS-Additional-Activation-Categories-for-Banking/m-p/277143#M105482</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-19T16:12:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

