<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic bonding and ClusterXL in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95051#M10513</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a bond on 12600 appliance with 255 vlan on it , the port channel on my cisco Switch is up , on Firewall side it's up and all vlan interfaces are up, but i have some issues on HA with this bond , it stays down ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob show_bond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;|Slaves |Slaves |Slaves&lt;BR /&gt;Bond name |Mode |State |configured |link up |required&lt;BR /&gt;-----------+-------------------+------+-----------+--------+--------&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1601 | Load Sharing | DOWN | 2 | 2 | 1&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1855 | Load Sharing | DOWN | 2 | 2 | 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond7&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation&lt;BR /&gt;Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;MII Polling Interval (ms): 100&lt;BR /&gt;Up Delay (ms): 200&lt;BR /&gt;Down Delay (ms): 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;802.3ad info&lt;BR /&gt;LACP rate: slow&lt;BR /&gt;Min links: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable&lt;BR /&gt;System priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;Active Aggregator Info:&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Number of ports: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Mac Address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 1000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 3&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 1&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 8735&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-04&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 1000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 5&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d7&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 2&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 87&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob -a if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCP mode: Manual (Unicast)&lt;BR /&gt;Required interfaces: 5&lt;BR /&gt;Required secured interfaces: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Name: Status:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sync (S) UP&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt UP&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01.118 UP&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1601 (LS) DOWN (13329.3 secs)&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02.1101 UP&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02.1355 UP&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1855 (LS) DOWN (13329.3 secs)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also after rebooting i have the message "ha module not started" ,i'm forced to start the process cphamcset manualy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob -a if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HA module not started.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Warning: Sync will not function since there aren't any sync(secured) interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does anyone know if there is any limiation on vlan interface with bonding that can cause ClusterXL to go crazy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ayoub_Bou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-24T13:26:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>bonding and ClusterXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95051#M10513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a bond on 12600 appliance with 255 vlan on it , the port channel on my cisco Switch is up , on Firewall side it's up and all vlan interfaces are up, but i have some issues on HA with this bond , it stays down ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob show_bond&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;|Slaves |Slaves |Slaves&lt;BR /&gt;Bond name |Mode |State |configured |link up |required&lt;BR /&gt;-----------+-------------------+------+-----------+--------+--------&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1601 | Load Sharing | DOWN | 2 | 2 | 1&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1855 | Load Sharing | DOWN | 2 | 2 | 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond7&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation&lt;BR /&gt;Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;MII Polling Interval (ms): 100&lt;BR /&gt;Up Delay (ms): 200&lt;BR /&gt;Down Delay (ms): 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;802.3ad info&lt;BR /&gt;LACP rate: slow&lt;BR /&gt;Min links: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator selection policy (ad_select): stable&lt;BR /&gt;System priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;System MAC address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;Active Aggregator Info:&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Number of ports: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Mac Address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-01&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 1000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 3&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 1&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 8735&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slave Interface: eth1-04&lt;BR /&gt;MII Status: up&lt;BR /&gt;Speed: 1000 Mbps&lt;BR /&gt;Duplex: full&lt;BR /&gt;Link Failure Count: 5&lt;BR /&gt;Permanent HW addr: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d7&lt;BR /&gt;Slave queue ID: 0&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregator ID: 2&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churn State: none&lt;BR /&gt;Actor Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;Partner Churned Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;details actor lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:1c:7f:30:91:d4&lt;BR /&gt;port key: 9&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 255&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 2&lt;BR /&gt;port state: 61&lt;BR /&gt;details partner lacp pdu:&lt;BR /&gt;system priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;system mac address: 00:3a:9c:1f:f6:42&lt;BR /&gt;oper key: 776&lt;BR /&gt;port priority: 32768&lt;BR /&gt;port number: 87&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob -a if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCP mode: Manual (Unicast)&lt;BR /&gt;Required interfaces: 5&lt;BR /&gt;Required secured interfaces: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interface Name: Status:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sync (S) UP&lt;BR /&gt;Mgmt UP&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-01.118 UP&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1601 (LS) DOWN (13329.3 secs)&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02.1101 UP&lt;BR /&gt;eth3-02.1355 UP&lt;BR /&gt;bond7.1855 (LS) DOWN (13329.3 secs)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also after rebooting i have the message "ha module not started" ,i'm forced to start the process cphamcset manualy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Expert@CKPT-FW:0]# cphaprob -a if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HA module not started.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Warning: Sync will not function since there aren't any sync(secured) interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does anyone know if there is any limiation on vlan interface with bonding that can cause ClusterXL to go crazy &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95051#M10513</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ayoub_Bou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-24T13:26:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bonding and ClusterXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95066#M10514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I assume the two firewalls can see each other's traffic on VLANs&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;1601 &amp;amp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1855, if so is there also at least one other responding IP address on those two VLANs other than the cluster members?&amp;nbsp; If not the interface will be declared down by ClusterXL.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As far as the "there is no sync interface" message, this can be caused by a variety of ClusterXL issues, see this SK for increasingly intrusive ways to rectify it:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="cp_link sc_ellipsis" href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk39047&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Cluster" data-hasqtip="32" aria-describedby="qtip-32" target="_blank"&gt;sk39047: Output of 'cphaprob -a if' command shows '&lt;STRONG&gt;Sync&lt;/STRONG&gt; will not function since &lt;STRONG&gt;there&lt;/STRONG&gt; aren't &lt;STRONG&gt;any&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;sync&lt;/STRONG&gt;(secured) interfaces' after replacing o&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95066#M10514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy_Hall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-24T15:00:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: bonding and ClusterXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95086#M10515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/26123"&gt;@Ayoub_Bou&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sometimes I saw this error „&lt;SPAN&gt;Warning: Sync will not function since there aren't any sync(secured) interfaces“.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;All problematic cases are solved with Step 1 from&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk39047&amp;amp;partition=Basic&amp;amp;product=Cluster" target="_self"&gt;Output of 'cphaprob -a if' command shows 'Sync will not function since there aren't any sync(secured) interfaces' ...&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;mentioned by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/597"&gt;@Timothy_Hall&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Wolfgang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/bonding-and-ClusterXL/m-p/95086#M10515</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wolfgang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-24T19:39:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

