<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Blink answers.xml and ElasticXL in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276172#M105120</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, there's not a documented way to set up a firewall as an ElasticXL cluster via Blink. Fortunately, you only need to build the first member, as all the others clone lv_current from an existing member when they join the cluster, so it's not like you use Blink with members 2+.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would just build them with config_system, install the jumbo you want, then plug them in and have them adopt subsequent members.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-28T15:00:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Blink answers.xml and ElasticXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276138#M105108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello CheckMates,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering if anyone tried to install Check Point Gateway with blink tool as a ElasticXL cluster ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a near future I will have a task to install something like 80+ gateways with almost identical configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;This is ideal scenario for orchestration with blink.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I don't want to use ClusterXL anymore, but obviously a newer and in my opinion a way better ElasticXL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For all of you who know blink, you know that there is answers.xml file which you should prepare upfront (and couple more files obviously).&lt;BR /&gt;In case of gateway in answers.xml file there is this section:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;lt;role_configuration&amp;gt;
	&amp;lt;gateway&amp;gt;
		&amp;lt;activation_key&amp;gt;SIC password in b64&amp;lt;/activation_key&amp;gt;
		&amp;lt;cluster&amp;gt;true&amp;lt;/cluster&amp;gt;
	&amp;lt;/gateway&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/role_configuration&amp;gt;&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in case of cluster ... we need to use here &amp;lt;cluster&amp;gt;true&amp;lt;/cluster&amp;gt; .... but this days we have two options (besides legacy VRRP): ClusterXL and ElasticXL ... which we can choose using FTW.&lt;BR /&gt;How to do it with answers.xml and choose ElasticXL ? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm preety sure that with &amp;lt;cluster&amp;gt;true&amp;lt;/cluster&amp;gt; it will be good and old friend ClusterXL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't find a newer version of answers.xml that includes R82's changes.&lt;BR /&gt;The&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk120193" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk120193&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;was updated with R82 ... but I'm affraid that only in regards download links for R82 tgz blink image ... which is also not updated for some time, because it is still build 777 (which has CRL issue) ... and not 779.&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately section regarding answers.xml was not updated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody know how to deal with this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;Sincerely&lt;BR /&gt;m.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276138#M105108</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-27T19:44:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Blink answers.xml and ElasticXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276161#M105115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As until now there is no feedback maybe I'll give one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) how to do it with blink ... I don't know ... that's why I asked, it is also possible that right now it is simply not implemented yet&lt;BR /&gt;2) ... but we can always use "config_system" ... where we have for example "smo_config=true"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So even if blink will not be possible (is it ?) ... config_system is always possible.&lt;BR /&gt;But it will not be "one click solution" (as with blink) but a little bit more steps will be required, for example:&lt;BR /&gt;step 1) config_system&lt;BR /&gt;step 2) import gaia config file&lt;BR /&gt;step 3) update to chosen JHF&lt;BR /&gt;Nothing bad ... but with blink it will be just more simple and more automated &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So ... in case anyone was wondering if some kind of orchestration is possible in case ElasticXL deployment ... of course it is.&lt;BR /&gt;But is it possible now with blink ... I don't know &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;m.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276161#M105115</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-28T11:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Blink answers.xml and ElasticXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276172#M105120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, there's not a documented way to set up a firewall as an ElasticXL cluster via Blink. Fortunately, you only need to build the first member, as all the others clone lv_current from an existing member when they join the cluster, so it's not like you use Blink with members 2+.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would just build them with config_system, install the jumbo you want, then plug them in and have them adopt subsequent members.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276172#M105120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob_Zimmerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-28T15:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Blink answers.xml and ElasticXL</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276173#M105121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yup ... this is the only option that I'm aware at this point.&lt;BR /&gt;And I just mentioned this above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why blink ? because as I describet this above it will be ... one command where I will have 3 tasks (upgrade, ftw, Gaia config).&lt;BR /&gt;But ... config_system will also do the job ... a little bit more work, but not a lot more ... so OK &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;m.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Blink-answers-xml-and-ElasticXL/m-p/276173#M105121</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-28T15:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

