https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Address-range-for-IP-Pool-NAT/m-p/97391#M10434 <P>If I have range of 10 external IP addresses (A.B.C.1 - A.B.C.10) and 2 IPs (A.B.C.3 and A.B.C.5) are already used for Static NAT is it possible to use the entire range for IP Pool NAT or is there going to be a conflict in the way connections are NATed for those 2 IPs?</P> <P>Also is it possible to include SG own IP in the address range for IP Pool NAT or it has to be excluded ?</P> Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:53:51 GMT HristoGrigorov 2020-09-24T03:53:51Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Address-range-for-IP-Pool-NAT/m-p/97391#M10434 <P>If I have range of 10 external IP addresses (A.B.C.1 - A.B.C.10) and 2 IPs (A.B.C.3 and A.B.C.5) are already used for Static NAT is it possible to use the entire range for IP Pool NAT or is there going to be a conflict in the way connections are NATed for those 2 IPs?</P> <P>Also is it possible to include SG own IP in the address range for IP Pool NAT or it has to be excluded ?</P> Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:53:51 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Address-range-for-IP-Pool-NAT/m-p/97391#M10434 HristoGrigorov 2020-09-24T03:53:51Z https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Address-range-for-IP-Pool-NAT/m-p/97601#M10435 <P>Pretty sure what you're asking won't work/isn't supported.<BR />The policy probably won't even compile.</P> Sat, 26 Sep 2020 21:22:10 GMT https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Address-range-for-IP-Pool-NAT/m-p/97601#M10435 PhoneBoy 2020-09-26T21:22:10Z