<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nested Inline layers with different Sharing permission in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Nested-Inline-layers-with-different-Sharing-permission/m-p/2391#M102567</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the desired behavior. You will not be able to pick this inline-of-inline layer anywhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything that is done to a layer that is reused in multiple policies will have a sort of a "wide impact". So similar to the fact that you can see a layer in one policy, change its rules, and then they will also be changed in another policy because the same layer was reused in it, adding an inline-of-inline layer will add to both policies. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 08:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tomer_Sole</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-27T08:18:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nested Inline layers with different Sharing permission</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Nested-Inline-layers-with-different-Sharing-permission/m-p/2390#M102566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I create a layer inline with "Shared" enabled, as expected this layer can be shared in another Policy Package.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I create another nested layer, i.e. inline within inline, and I have "Shared" disabled, I noticed that the nested inline layer is automatically shared with the other policy package, despite the fact that it was disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this conform expectations?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 08:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Nested-Inline-layers-with-different-Sharing-permission/m-p/2390#M102566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Griekspoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-27T08:12:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nested Inline layers with different Sharing permission</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Nested-Inline-layers-with-different-Sharing-permission/m-p/2391#M102567</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the desired behavior. You will not be able to pick this inline-of-inline layer anywhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything that is done to a layer that is reused in multiple policies will have a sort of a "wide impact". So similar to the fact that you can see a layer in one policy, change its rules, and then they will also be changed in another policy because the same layer was reused in it, adding an inline-of-inline layer will add to both policies. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 08:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Nested-Inline-layers-with-different-Sharing-permission/m-p/2391#M102567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomer_Sole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-27T08:18:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

