<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2470#M102498</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would like to know if R80 support FQDN as the source/destination in the access rule?If yes, how is it working? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sammo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:32:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sammo_Li</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-22T10:32:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2470#M102498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would like to know if R80 support FQDN as the source/destination in the access rule?If yes, how is it working? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sammo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:32:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2470#M102498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sammo_Li</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-22T10:32:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2471#M102499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in R80.10 domain objects support FQDN mode, so you could define a domain object, and mark it as FQDN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. This is supported only from R80.10 GW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. In R80.10 domain objects have much better performance as they no longer disable accept templates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Limor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2471#M102499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Limor_Ganon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-22T15:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2472#M102500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply Limor. Just want to know a little more about the mechanism. If I put the domain object into an Access Rule. When a user go to a server, the GW will only see the server IP but not the FQDN. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The GW will do a reverse DNS lookup of the IP or other way to know the FQDN of the IP? (Such as HTTP host field).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sammo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2472#M102500</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sammo_Li</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-23T07:44:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2473#M102501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, it's correct - we have the destination IP and do reverse DNS request to get the domain name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, if &lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt; domains objects in policy are FQDN mode - we don't have to perform reverse DNS requests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We simply keep a cache [IP-&amp;gt;Domain Name] and fills it with IPs that we get from &lt;STRONG&gt;direct&lt;/STRONG&gt; DNS resolving of the domain objects that are used in the policy [We re-send direct resolving request every 30 seconds (configurable) to collect all IPs]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, we have the destination IP and search for the domain name in the cache.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is at least one domain object that is not FQDN - then, if we won't find the IP in the cache, we will do a reverse DNS request to get the domain name and check if it's a sub-domain of one of the objects in the policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meital&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2016 07:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2473#M102501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Meital_Natanson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-26T07:29:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2474#M102502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could Checkpoint do a FQDN like this: *.checkpoint.com ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2474#M102502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duyen_Ngo_Van</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-28T09:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2475#M102503</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In R80.10 - Yes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you define a domain object - you can choose if you want FQDN or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FQDN for checkpoint.com will be matched on traffic for checkpoint.com only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-FQDN will be matched for *.checkpoint.com sub-domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meital &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2475#M102503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Meital_Natanson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-30T15:16:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2476#M102504</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is great news! &amp;nbsp;Out of curiosity, is there a way to query the cache on the gateway to see what it thinks the FQDN should resolve to? &amp;nbsp; Just looking for some basic troubleshooting steps. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 02:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2476#M102504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian_Deutmeyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-24T02:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2477#M102505</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if an R80.10 gateway can do DNS lookup based on FQDN then does that then mean for O365 and Azure you can just provide *.microsoft.com instead of the 4000+ network/ips that are currently required to bypass SSL inspection?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2477#M102505</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave_Taylor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T16:17:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2478#M102506</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a few more domains than that as I recall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even so,&amp;nbsp;I don't believe Domain Objects are supported with the HTTPS Inspection rulebase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said a solution to this problem is planned for the near term (post R80.10).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 19:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2478#M102506</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T19:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2479#M102507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed domain objects are not available in HTTPSI policy (should be supported in upcoming version/s).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also - for FQDN, you need to specify the exact fully qualified domain (with no wildcard).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;As for office 365 - we are now in the process of releasing a HF on top of R80.10 (jumbo 24) that allows to use dynamic objects that represent office 365 services.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;Currently this HF is in EA phase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;If this may interest you - please contact me directly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;"&gt;Limor&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2479#M102507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Limor_Ganon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-05T06:14:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2480#M102508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Limor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea when this HFA is going GA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2480#M102508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-03T00:40:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2481#M102509</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This HF is currently in EA stage. More information about it is available in &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk119562"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;sk119562&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; (currently internal).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Once there are enough EA deployments, we will release it as public.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;If you would like to install it in EA stage - please contact your SE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Limor&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2481#M102509</guid>
      <dc:creator>Limor_Ganon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-03T12:55:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2482#M102510</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/migrated-users/42928"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/people/meita5ded0c4b-2998-32d8-a627-37bb680eeb5d&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i define .checkpoint.com as my domain object and tick off FQDN option to make it a wildcard domain and then if i add 2 A records like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;test.checkpoint.com (8.8.8.8)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; test2.checkpoint.com (8.8.4.4)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't ping to above mentioned A records but I can ping to checkpoint.com. What changes should I make to get the above scenario working.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI: Take 42 HF applied&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2482#M102510</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shehan_Wickrama</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-10T04:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2483#M102511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The FQDN option uses forward DNS lookups (DNS name to IP mapping)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As there is no way to do a forward lookup of a wildcard, you must list the explicit FQDNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This option is SecureXL friendly and supported in R80.10+ gateways.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unchecking the FQDN option will use reverse DNS lookups (IP to DNS name mapping), which will work with all versions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, this option often&amp;nbsp;produces inaccurate results as&amp;nbsp;many sites use IPs that do not map to the expected DNS names.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just as an example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;dwelch@host&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;~&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;$ &lt;STRONG&gt;nslookup google.com&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Server:&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;8.8.8.8&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Address:&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;8.8.8.8#53&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Non-authoritative answer:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Name:&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;google.com&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Address: 172.217.11.174&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;dwelch@host&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;~&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;$ &lt;STRONG&gt;nslookup 172.217.11.174&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Server:&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;8.8.8.8&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Address:&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;8.8.8.8#53&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Non-authoritative answer:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;174.11.217.172.in-addr.arpa&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;name = lax28s15-in-f14.1e100.net.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Authoritative answers can be found from:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;dwelch@kermit&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;~&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;$&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2483#M102511</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-10T06:47:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FQDN in R80 Policy Access rule</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2484#M102512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You Welch!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/FQDN-in-R80-Policy-Access-rule/m-p/2484#M102512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shehan_Wickrama</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T06:23:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

