<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules in Firewall and Security Management</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3938#M101659</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That did indeed work. I will see about getting that SK updated for R80.10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Much appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>William_Garner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-05T17:02:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3934#M101655</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need the ability to manage a remote R80.10 SmartCenter that is on the other side of a Check Point R80.10 GW. The two locations are connected via a site to site VPN.&amp;nbsp;CPM traffic from remote SmartConsole client R80.10 is sent in the clear to R80.10 SmartCenter because of implied rules instead of being encrypted by the site to site VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SK105719 describes the procedure in earlier versions by removing CPMI from the implied rules but does not reference CPM. I have verified that turning off all implied rules in global properties will fix the problem but I only want to remove CPM (tcp 19009) and CPMI (tcp 18190).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 05:18:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3934#M101655</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Garner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T05:18:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3935#M101656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The checkbox&amp;nbsp;that controls this implied rule is "Accept Control Connections". It also generates 36 additional implied rules, all responsible for the different Check Point processes and the interactions between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3935#M101656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomer_Sole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T06:58:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3936#M101657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tomer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes unchecking "Accept Control Connections" will allow the SmartConsole client to connect over the VPN but having a workaround that only excludes CPM and CPMI would be helpful. If this was a VSX environment, disabling "Accept Control Connections", would cause problems with provisioning virtual hardware.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3936#M101657</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Garner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T17:06:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3937#M101658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "#define ENABLE_CPMI" in $FWDIR/lib/implied_rules.def on SmartCenter should&amp;nbsp;also responsible for the CPM-Traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See following output:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;# cat implied_rules.def | grep CPM&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;#define ENABLE_CPMI&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;#ifdef ENABLE_CPMI&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; (dport = CPMI_PORT or dport = CPMI_PORT_NGM), tcp, \&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt; (sport = CPMI_PORT or sport = CPMI_PORT_NGM), tcp,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;# cat services.def | grep CPMI_PORT_NGM&lt;BR /&gt;#ifndef CPMI_PORT_NGM&lt;BR /&gt;#define CPMI_PORT_NGM 19009&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it should be possible to exclude CPM/CPMI-Traffic by commenting out the "#define ENABLE_CPMI" like the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;/* #define ENABLE_CPMI */&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Be sure to backup your files beforehand &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.checkpoint.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 12:36:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3937#M101658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norbert_Bohusch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T12:36:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3938#M101659</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That did indeed work. I will see about getting that SK updated for R80.10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Much appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3938#M101659</guid>
      <dc:creator>William_Garner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T17:02:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Exclude CPM traffic from implied rules</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3939#M101660</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for sharing this info. I commented radius out of $FWDIR/lib/implied_rules.def. I needed to exclude this traffic because we use a route-based VPN in our situation. I noticed that the specific connection was accepted by a implied rule (control connection) and leaving the gateway un-encrypted via the wrong interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found &lt;A href="https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&amp;amp;solutionid=sk32564&amp;amp;partition=General&amp;amp;product=IPSec"&gt;sk32564&lt;/A&gt; explaining WHY this happens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetz!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jelle&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Firewall-and-Security-Management/Exclude-CPM-traffic-from-implied-rules/m-p/3939#M101660</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Jelle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-15T20:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

