<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan in Cloud Firewall</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181928#M5995</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That might be a bit tricky, since sk clearly states its not supported...maybe you can get an official response from TAC about it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-24T13:40:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181869#M5990</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure how I should cope with this problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now we have couple of subnets on the same vlan. Lets say 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24. I need to create Cluster of two members.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking of doing next:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Create Allias IPs on that interface (GW1:192.168.1.1 GW1:192.168.2.1 and GW2:192.168.1.2 GW2:192.168.2.2) on web console,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Create new interfaces via smart console with network type: Cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Create virtual IPs as 192.168.1.254 and 192.168.2.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Add cluster members as GW1:192.168.1.1 GW2:192.168.1.2 and GW1:192.168.2.1 GW2:192.168.2.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. Set topology to Internal and disable Anti-Spoofing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it work or I should do something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. I know that is bad to have two or more subnets on same vlan, but I need to stay on same logic as it was before.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 07:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181869#M5990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Strongiukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T07:25:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181916#M5991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I really hope below will be useful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-CXLG/Cluster-IP-addresses-on-different-subnets.htm?tocpath=Advanced%20Features%20and%20Procedures%7CCluster%20IP%20Addresses%20on%20Different%20Subnets%7C_____0" target="_blank"&gt;https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-CXLG/Cluster-IP-addresses-on-different-subnets.htm?tocpath=Advanced%20Features%20and%20Procedures%7CCluster%20IP%20Addresses%20on%20Different%20Subnets%7C_____0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/ClusterXL-Different-Subnet-Configuration/td-p/8020" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Security-Gateways/ClusterXL-Different-Subnet-Configuration/td-p/8020&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Configuring-Cluster-Addresses-on-Different-Subnets/td-p/29555" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Configuring-Cluster-Addresses-on-Different-Subnets/td-p/29555&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181916#M5991</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T13:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181919#M5992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Use of aliases with ClusterXL is not supported per&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;sk89980 / sk31821&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 15:43:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181919#M5992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Atkinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T15:43:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181922#M5993</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for pointing that out Chris &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181922#M5993</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T13:20:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181924#M5994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, thanks for pointing out. But maybe you have any suggestions then?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is not possible to separate&amp;nbsp; those subnet through vlan's, because of lack of managed switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe it is possible to move those aliases to different interfaces and then connect everything to one switch?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181924#M5994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Strongiukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T13:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181928#M5995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That might be a bit tricky, since sk clearly states its not supported...maybe you can get an official response from TAC about it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/181928#M5995</guid>
      <dc:creator>the_rock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T13:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster with two subnets on single vlan</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/182040#M5996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interface aliases are not supported with clustering.&lt;BR /&gt;The only other way to do this is with physical interfaces connected to the same switch.&lt;BR /&gt;I haven't heard of any issues with doing this, but that doesn't mean there won't be.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 22:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/Cluster-with-two-subnets-on-single-vlan/m-p/182040#M5996</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T22:00:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

