<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP does not import route from second peer in Cloud Firewall</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59128#M2812</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;we have request some help from peering member.&amp;nbsp; so far they had give us some sample configuration that should work. However, based on the sample configuration it is required to enabled next-hop-self configuration on each peer. i believe it is the same as nexthop-self in check point configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on my testing, nexthop-self can only be enabled when you are using confederation configuration. i try to search on how to enable nexthop-self using normal AS configuration instead of using confederation. does anybody know how to do this? below are the sample config from peer member that should work. just looking a way how to convert this to checkpoint based configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;router bgp (peer asn)
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp enforce-first-as
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 peer-group
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 remote-as 138009
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 description XXX-RS-IPv4-Peering-Lan
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 peer-group
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 remote-as 138009
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 description XXX-RS-IPv6-Peering-Lan
neighbor x.x.x.x remote-as 138009
neighbor x.x.x.x peer-group XXX-RS-v4
neighbor x.x.x.x description RS1
neighbor x.x.x.y remote-as 138009
neighbor x.x.x.y peer-group XXX-RS-v4
neighbor x.x.x.y description RS2
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 remote-as 138009
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 peer-group  XXX-RS-v6
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 description RS0
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 remote-as 138009
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 peer-group XXX-RS-v6
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 description RS1
!
address-family ipv4
  neighbor x.x.x.x activate
  neighbor x.x.x.y activate
  neighbor XXX-RS-v4 send-community
  neighbor XXX-RS-v4 next-hop-self
  exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv6
  neighbor dddd:dddd::1 activate
  neighbor dddd:dddd::2 activate
  neighbor XXX-RS-v6 send-community
  neighbor XXX-RS-v6 next-hop-self
  exit-address-family
!&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-29T06:12:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57625#M2807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently configuring checkpoint to connect to two BGP peer using different AS. We have configure routemap to import routes coming from these two AS with specific local preference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Slide1.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1818i534AE4BC18979B82/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Slide1.jpeg" alt="Slide1.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;local AS number is 138932. we have setup two routemap rules which stated as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set routemap ipv4-new-import id 6 on&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap ipv4-new-import id 6 allow&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap ipv4-new-import id 6 match as 38182 on&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap ipv4-new-import id 6 action localpref 15&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set routemap jbix-import id 5 on&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap jbix-import id 5 allow&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap jbix-import id 5 match as 2.6937 on&lt;BR /&gt;set routemap jbix-import id 5 action localpref 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the issue that we have is that it seems like our checkpoint firewall manage to import route from AS 38182 but not from AS138009.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i can confirm that there are routes being distribute from peer AS 138009 as i can see these routes with state Hidden and inactive when i run &lt;STRONG&gt;show route &lt;/STRONG&gt;bgp&lt;STRONG&gt; all&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;below are output from &lt;STRONG&gt;show &lt;/STRONG&gt;bgp&lt;STRONG&gt; peers&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PeerID AS Routes ActRts State InUpds OutUpds Uptime&lt;BR /&gt;x.x.x.x 38182 782587 782585 Established 139987 1 00:22:32&lt;BR /&gt;y.y.y.y 2.6937 66241 0 Established 12965 1 00:25:08&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we try to simulate AS 38182 as down and still the route from AS 138009 is not being imported. i did try to change the routemap from using match as number to match nexthop, but still with no luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have also try to disable routemap and use inbound route filter instead, still not able to import routes coming from AS138009.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would appreciate if anyone could help on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 01:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57625#M2807</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-07T01:47:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57636#M2808</link>
      <description>To my knowledge AS numbers cannot exceed 65535.&lt;BR /&gt;I also never seen a dot used inside the AS number.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 07:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57636#M2808</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten_Sjouw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-07T07:59:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57895#M2809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would suggest to involve TAC to resolve the issue !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/57895#M2809</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_W_Albrecht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-10T11:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59126#M2810</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The AS number that you see is valid. it is actually a production AS number that our customer is getting from APNIC. by default when you add this AS number it will change directly to dot number.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59126#M2810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T06:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59127#M2811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are currently doing a POC, i believe TAC will required a valid license and support to troubleshoot. am i correct?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59127#M2811</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T06:02:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59128#M2812</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;we have request some help from peering member.&amp;nbsp; so far they had give us some sample configuration that should work. However, based on the sample configuration it is required to enabled next-hop-self configuration on each peer. i believe it is the same as nexthop-self in check point configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on my testing, nexthop-self can only be enabled when you are using confederation configuration. i try to search on how to enable nexthop-self using normal AS configuration instead of using confederation. does anybody know how to do this? below are the sample config from peer member that should work. just looking a way how to convert this to checkpoint based configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;router bgp (peer asn)
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp enforce-first-as
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 peer-group
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 remote-as 138009
neighbor XXX-RS-v4 description XXX-RS-IPv4-Peering-Lan
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 peer-group
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 remote-as 138009
neighbor XXX-RS-v6 description XXX-RS-IPv6-Peering-Lan
neighbor x.x.x.x remote-as 138009
neighbor x.x.x.x peer-group XXX-RS-v4
neighbor x.x.x.x description RS1
neighbor x.x.x.y remote-as 138009
neighbor x.x.x.y peer-group XXX-RS-v4
neighbor x.x.x.y description RS2
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 remote-as 138009
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 peer-group  XXX-RS-v6
neighbor dddd:dddd::1 description RS0
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 remote-as 138009
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 peer-group XXX-RS-v6
neighbor dddd:dddd::2 description RS1
!
address-family ipv4
  neighbor x.x.x.x activate
  neighbor x.x.x.y activate
  neighbor XXX-RS-v4 send-community
  neighbor XXX-RS-v4 next-hop-self
  exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv6
  neighbor dddd:dddd::1 activate
  neighbor dddd:dddd::2 activate
  neighbor XXX-RS-v6 send-community
  neighbor XXX-RS-v6 next-hop-self
  exit-address-family
!&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59128#M2812</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T06:12:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP does not import route from second peer</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59132#M2813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After debugging the routed logs for sometime, i just notice that the peer is actually sending the first AS with&amp;nbsp; a different AS number instead of his 138009 . Enabling ignore the first AS does help to activate and import the routes coming from the problematic AS 138009.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So it can consider solved. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tears_of_joy:"&gt;😂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Cloud-Firewall/BGP-does-not-import-route-from-second-peer/m-p/59132#M2813</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abeja_huhuhu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-29T07:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

